2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of an Optimal Cut-Off Point for the Ki-67 Index as a Prognostic Factor in Primary Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study

Abstract: The Ki-67 index is an important biomarker for indicating the proliferation of cancer cells and is considered to be an effective prognostic factor for breast cancer. However, a standard cut-off point for the Ki-67 index has not yet been established. Therefore, the aim of this retrospective study was to determine an optimal cut-off point in order to establish it as a more accurate prognostic factor. Immunohistochemical analysis of the Ki-67 index was performed on 4329 patients with primary breast cancer from Aug… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
55
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
55
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Ki-67 index was strongly ( r  = 0.71; p  < 0.05) correlated with tumor malignancy. The results suggest association of Ki-67 with malignancy in canine CRC as was previously reported for human CRC [2, 15], prostate and breast cancers [14, 32] and various animal tumors [30, 3335]. Because, there are genetic and pathogenic similarities between canine CRC and the human disease [36], in which Ki-67 prognostic value remained controversial [1, 14], its prognostic value in canine CRC is unknown at this time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Ki-67 index was strongly ( r  = 0.71; p  < 0.05) correlated with tumor malignancy. The results suggest association of Ki-67 with malignancy in canine CRC as was previously reported for human CRC [2, 15], prostate and breast cancers [14, 32] and various animal tumors [30, 3335]. Because, there are genetic and pathogenic similarities between canine CRC and the human disease [36], in which Ki-67 prognostic value remained controversial [1, 14], its prognostic value in canine CRC is unknown at this time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In the present study, when the Ki-67 index was >30%, it was considered high. It must be highlighted that numerous cut-off values have been proposed in the literature (37,38), and that the reproducibility of the test for Ki-67 is still far from being elevated, due to an important inter-observer and inter-laboratory variability (38). Recently, Goldhirsch et al (39) classified the Ki-67 index into three classes, considering as cut-off value the presence of ≥20% of neoplastic, invasive Ki-67-positive cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional assessments included safety and tolerability, evaluation of health‐related quality of life (not reported), determination of plasma C trough of palbociclib combined with letrozole in all patients, and evaluation of the full PK profile of palbociclib in a subset of treated patients (n = 6). We also characterized biomarkers of tumor sensitivity and/or resistance in tumor tissue samples, such as the Ki‐67 index, for which a 20% cutoff has been determined to be optimal (a significant factor for overall survival), or the most effective prognostic factor for luminal/HER2− breast cancer based on a study of 4329 Japanese patients with primary breast cancer …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also characterized biomarkers of tumor sensitivity and/or resistance in tumor tissue samples, such as the Ki-67 index, for which a 20% cutoff has been determined to be optimal (a significant factor for overall survival), or the most effective prognostic factor for luminal/HER2À breast cancer based on a study of 4329 Japanese patients with primary breast cancer. 19 The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board at each participating center, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients before enrollment. The study was conducted according to applicable local laws and regulatory requirements, the International Conference on Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice guidelines, and the Declaration of Helsinki.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%