2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10763-004-6531-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of an Innovative Mathematics Program in Terms of Classroom Environment, Student Attitudes, and Conceptual Development

Abstract: Dull classroom environments, poor students' attitudes and inhibited conceptual development led to the creation of an innovative mathematics program, the Class Banking System (CBS), which enables teachers to use constructivist ideas and approaches. To assess the effectiveness of the CBS, the Individualised Classroom Environment Questionnaire (ICEQ), Constructivist Learning Environment Survey (CLES), Test of MathematicsRelated Attitudes (TOMRA), and concept map tests were administered to two groups of fifth-grad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(26 reference statements)
3
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the study contributes to the field of learning environments research by adding another study to the limited research that has employed the classroom environment as a criterion of effectiveness in evaluating educational innovations (e.g. Teh & Fraser, 1994;Maor & Fraser, 1996;Nix et al, 2005;Spinner & Fraser, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the study contributes to the field of learning environments research by adding another study to the limited research that has employed the classroom environment as a criterion of effectiveness in evaluating educational innovations (e.g. Teh & Fraser, 1994;Maor & Fraser, 1996;Nix et al, 2005;Spinner & Fraser, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, several widely applicable and carefully validated questionnaires for assessing student perceptions of classroom environments formed the starting point for the selection and adaptation of a learning environment questionnaire for use in the present study. Second, this study followed previous research (Teh & Fraser, 1994;Maor & Fraser, 1996;Nix et al, 2005;Spinner & Fraser, 2005) in which educational innovations have been evaluated in part in terms of their impact in transforming the classroom learning environment Wong & Fraser, 1996).…”
Section: Learning Environments and Attitudes To Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, other specificpurpose instruments were developed, validated and applied for a variety of research purposes around the world. In particular, these questionnaires include the Science Laboratory Environment Inventory (SLEI; Fraser et al 1995;Henderson et al 2000;Lightburn and Fraser 2007;Wong and Fraser 1996), Constructivist Learning Environment Survey (CLES; Kim et al 1999;Nix et al 2005;Spinner and Fraser 2001;Taylor et al 1997) and the What Is Happening In this Class? (WIHIC) used in the present study (Aldridge et al 1999;Dorman 2003;Fraser and Chionh 2000;Ogbuehi and Fraser 2007).…”
Section: Learning Environments Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Test of Science-Related Attitudes (TOSRA, Fraser, 1981) has been frequently used to assess students_ attitudes, both in its original form with seven scales and 70 items and in shorter modified forms, and in modified form to assess attitudes to mathematics (Quek, Wong & Fraser, 2005;Spinner & Fraser, 2005). In addition to the six learning environment scales, eight items were selected from TOSRA_s Enjoyment of Science Lessons scale.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%