2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.05.450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of an Atlas-Based Segmentation Method for High-Risk Prostate Cancer With RTOG-Defined Pelvic Lymph Node Levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The share of studies that reported lower DSC values compared to ours was 13/19 (bladder), 15/19 (rectum), 9/11 (femurs). For pelvic nodes, we found only other two studies which reported mean DSC 0.74 27 and 0.71, 28 while we obtained a mean DSC of 0.85. Obviously, DSC values depend on the reference and cannot be considered an absolute measure of contour accuracy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…The share of studies that reported lower DSC values compared to ours was 13/19 (bladder), 15/19 (rectum), 9/11 (femurs). For pelvic nodes, we found only other two studies which reported mean DSC 0.74 27 and 0.71, 28 while we obtained a mean DSC of 0.85. Obviously, DSC values depend on the reference and cannot be considered an absolute measure of contour accuracy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…10, our results are approximatively compared to those found in literature. 3,11,19,[22][23][24]26,29,30,32,41 Our results are satisfactory when compared to many atlas-based studies and are comparable to those based on deep learning. 3,19 Of note, few studies in literature include PLN in the atlas and this is an added value of our study.…”
Section: Automatic Reg Refine (Arr) Optionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Original manual contours of pelvic lymph nodes (PLN), rectum, bladder, and femurs, used for treatment planning, were reviewed for consistency by a senior consultant radiation oncologist with 15 yr of experience, according to RTOG criteria and Taylor et al guidelines 28 for PLN, before adding them to the atlas. Prostate was not contoured as previous studies, 26,29,30 demonstrated that atlas based on CT image segmentation resulted in suboptimal prostate contours. In case of prostate, better results can be achieved using atlases based on MRI images, 31 or using deep learning 3,19,32 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%