2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasc.2022.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of ACR TI-RADS cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules and molecular profiles: a single-institutional experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Bethesda III and IV nodules, the reason might be related to the low number of cases, especially for Bethesda IV nodules, which needed to be further confirmed in future studies. In addition, malignancy rates of Bethesda III, IV, and V in the study population were much higher than those of the general population (33), which maybe associated with bases on surgical cohorts selection bias.…”
Section: The Diagnostic Difference Between S-detect and The Two Ti-ra...mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…For Bethesda III and IV nodules, the reason might be related to the low number of cases, especially for Bethesda IV nodules, which needed to be further confirmed in future studies. In addition, malignancy rates of Bethesda III, IV, and V in the study population were much higher than those of the general population (33), which maybe associated with bases on surgical cohorts selection bias.…”
Section: The Diagnostic Difference Between S-detect and The Two Ti-ra...mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Thus, it is understandable that a wide variability of malignancy from 15 to 85% may be present in TI-RADS IV findings [5,17,[24][25][26]. Thus, in case of doubt, histologic confirmation becomes necessary, especially when scintigraphy is not directional in small suspicious tumor foci [18,19]. Also CEUS perfusion imaging could be a very important appositional tool for detection small intra-cystic tumors, characterization of small malignant tumor and differentiation TI-RADS III, IV, and V lesions [4,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%