1994
DOI: 10.1016/0003-2670(94)80023-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of heavy metals in sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
101
0
26

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 279 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
10
101
0
26
Order By: Relevance
“…Other metals found in this F4 included Cd, Fe, Zn, Mn, Pb and Ni indicating that the metals occurred in the forms of stable organic complexes and metal sulfides. This is supported by previous studies (Davidson, et al, 1994). The high proportion of Fe in F5 in all samples suggests that the source of Fe in all surveyed stations is lithogenic.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Other metals found in this F4 included Cd, Fe, Zn, Mn, Pb and Ni indicating that the metals occurred in the forms of stable organic complexes and metal sulfides. This is supported by previous studies (Davidson, et al, 1994). The high proportion of Fe in F5 in all samples suggests that the source of Fe in all surveyed stations is lithogenic.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…From Figure 1 on, we see that there is an increase in the potential mobility as we reach the mouth of the Sinos River, especially at the Luiz Rau stream, where it reaches 60 %. Cu was extracted mainly in the reducible and oxidizable fractions of the sequential extraction procedure, as reported by Davidson et al (1994) and Vymazal et al (2010).…”
Section: Fig 1 Geochemical Distribution Of Cu Zn Ni and Cr In Thementioning
confidence: 84%
“…One technique often used is the sequential extraction procedure proposed by the Community Bureau of Reference (BCR) (now Standards, Measurement and Testing Programme), which involves three stepsexchangeable metals associated with carbonates, reducible metals, and oxidizable metals (Pueyo et al, 2001;Quevauviller et al, 1996;Davidson et al, 1994;Davidson et al, 1999;Teixeira et al, 2003;Rodrigues & Formoso, 2006;Passos et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[37] The dominance of residual or resistant fractions of heavy metals is probably due to the low levels of total metals in sediments. [38] Similarly, Davidson et al [39] mention that sediments are relatively unpolluted. Metals in this form (resistant) are not soluble under experimental conditions and may therefore be considered to be tightly bound.…”
Section: Speciation Of Heavy Metals In Surface Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%