2017
DOI: 10.7225/toms.v06.n02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation Methodology for Ship’s Planned Maintenance System Database

Abstract: The paper describes an evaluation methodology for ship’s Planned Maintenance System database based on the application of a newly created questionnaire and the analysis of the evaluation results received by the questionnaire. The evaluation results of several databases and the analysis of evaluation results are also shown in the paper. The main purpose of the paper is to provide a simple and useful tool for the evaluation of all ships’ Planned Maintenance System databases, which will enable users to examine the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tool has been created with intention to give a strict guideline during the Evaluation of Ship's Planned Maintenance System databases, and by enforcing some rules to decrease the subjectivity (Hû et al 1999) of the evaluator (researcher). The Methodology has been tested in operation on several databases and the functionality of the Methodology has been established, as well as reliability of obtained results (Stazić et al 2017). Verifi cation of the functioning of the Methodology has been performed and published (Mišuraet et al 2019) and obtained results were similar to the results during development of the Methodology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The tool has been created with intention to give a strict guideline during the Evaluation of Ship's Planned Maintenance System databases, and by enforcing some rules to decrease the subjectivity (Hû et al 1999) of the evaluator (researcher). The Methodology has been tested in operation on several databases and the functionality of the Methodology has been established, as well as reliability of obtained results (Stazić et al 2017). Verifi cation of the functioning of the Methodology has been performed and published (Mišuraet et al 2019) and obtained results were similar to the results during development of the Methodology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This time all evaluators were using the Methodology, going through databases and answering to previously prepared questions (the Questionnaire) about the database. The Questionnaire is main part of the Evaluation Methodology for Ship's Planned Maintenance System Database and it is intended to ''be simple and useful tool for the evaluation of all ships Planned Maintenance System databases'' (Stazić et al 2017).…”
Section: The Second Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are shown separately for the first quality evaluation (Table 9) and the second quality evaluation (Table 10 and Table 11). The resemblance analysis of the evaluation grades was made according to Equation 1 (Stazić at al, 2017) as the next step of the analysis:…”
Section: Analysis Of Database Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ships planned maintenance is a complete system that is carried out mainly by using a computer program specifi cally designed for this purpose. Computerized PMS (Planned maintenance systems) are in use for more than thirty years [18], during which time they have become an important and irreplaceable factor in the maintenance of ship and ships systems.…”
Section: Introduction /Uvodmentioning
confidence: 99%