2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.07.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and selection of clustering methods using a hybrid group MCDM

Abstract: Due to the lack of objective measures, the evaluation and prioritization of clustering methods is inherently challenging. Since their evaluation generally involves numerous criteria, it can be designed as a multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) problem and using multiple data sets, the problem can be formulated as a group MCDM modeling. In this paper, a MCDM-based framework is proposed to evaluate and rank a number of clustering methods. The proposed approach employs three group MCDM algorithms and a Borda … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basic method whose results were further subjected to statistical verification was TOPSIS, which is a multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method [52,53]. Multicriteria decision-making has become a rapidly growing concept in the last decade, reflecting constant changes in individual sectors of the economy [54].…”
Section: Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic method whose results were further subjected to statistical verification was TOPSIS, which is a multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method [52,53]. Multicriteria decision-making has become a rapidly growing concept in the last decade, reflecting constant changes in individual sectors of the economy [54].…”
Section: Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Final ranks imply that the notion of the best alternative, given a set of criteria and information about the ordinal ranking of the alternatives, can be essentially considered as arbitrary voting methods. These methods include plurality [22], majority method (instant or two-round runoff) [23], pairwise comparison (Condorcet paradox or Copeland method) [24] and Borda rank [25]. Ref.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 5: Computation of the limiting super-matrix. We could acquire the limit of each super-matrix relative sorting vector by Equation (10). If the limit was convergent and unique, the value of the corresponding row of the original matrix was the weight of each index.…”
Section: Evaluating the Weights Of The Criteria Using Anpmentioning
confidence: 99%