1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-4694(97)00118-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and prognostication in coma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
23
1
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
23
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of standard neurophysiological methods used for evaluation and prognostication of coma has been reviewed recently by Chiappa and Hill [1998]. It is quite clear that both the electroencephalogram (EEG) and short-latency evoked potentials (EPs), in particular median nerve somatosensory EPs, provide useful prognostic information in comatose patients and seemingly fulfill the requirement of an objective measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of standard neurophysiological methods used for evaluation and prognostication of coma has been reviewed recently by Chiappa and Hill [1998]. It is quite clear that both the electroencephalogram (EEG) and short-latency evoked potentials (EPs), in particular median nerve somatosensory EPs, provide useful prognostic information in comatose patients and seemingly fulfill the requirement of an objective measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] Clinicians have also investigated the use of the electroencephalogram and somatosensory evoked potentials to predict outcome from anoxic coma. 4,[7][8][9] Unfortunately, despite much study, it has remained difficult to predict with certainty those patients who will definitely die.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a predictor of subject outcome following severe acute closed head injury (ACHI), the auditory brainstem response (ABR) has had signifi cant success both in its own right and in combination with other medical measures [Chatrian et al, 1996;Chiappa and Hill, 1998;Hall, 1986Hall, , 1988Moulton, 1997]. This success is confi rmed by the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology committee's inclusion of the ABR in their recommended minimum evoked potential test battery for the assessment of neurological status and prediction of outcome in comatose subjects [Chatrian et al, 1996].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of the ABR in this role appears to be due to the following [Chatrian et al, 1996;Chiappa and Hill, 1998;Hall, 1986Hall, , 1988Hall, , 1992Moulton, 1997;Soustiel et al, 1993]:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%