Evaluation and comparison of hemagglutination inhibition and indirect immunofluorescence tests for the detection of antibodies against duck Tembusu virus

Abstract

Currently, duck Tembusu virus (DTMUV), an emerging avian pathogenic flavivirus, is widely spread and becomes endemic in duck populations in Asia, causing significant economic losses in the duck producing industry. To early detection and control of DTMUV, the well-validated diagnostic tests for efficient detection of DTMUV infection in ducks are needed. In this study, we validated and compared hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and indirect immunofluorescence (IFA) tests for identifying antibodies against DTMUV in duck serum samples. Our results demonstrated that HI and IFA tests can both be used to detect antibodies against DTMUV in duck serum samples with high sensitivity (100%), specificity (>87%) and overall agreement with the gold standard serum neutralization (SN) test (>90%). Additionally, DTMUV-specific antibody titres determined by HI and IFA tests correlated well with the neutralizing antibody titres obtained by SN test. No cross-reactivity against common duck viruses and other flaviviruses was observed in both tests. It is interesting to note that HI test had higher diagnostic specificity and exhibited a stronger positive correlation with SN test than IFA test. Evaluating the performance of HI and IFA tests with experimental and field serum samples revealed that both tests showed comparable performance with SN test in terms of antibody kinetic and detection rate. Collectively, these findings support the use of both tests, particularly HI test, as the alternative to SN test for measuring the antibody responses against DTMUV in ducks. These tests could be the suitable choices for DTMUV diagnosis, epidemiological study and vaccine efficacy evaluation.

Advancements in Research on Duck Tembusu Virus Infections

“…By validating and comparing the hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and indirect immunofluorescence (IFA) methods for detecting DTMUV antibodies in duck serum, it was found that both methods have high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (>87%) and show over 90% agreement with the serum neutralization (SN) test results. Compared to the IFA test, the HI method demonstrated higher specificity and a stronger correlation with the SN test [105].…”