2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2016.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and comparison of 3D intervertebral disc localization and segmentation methods for 3D T2 MR data: A grand challenge

Abstract: Highlights• Establish a standard framework with 25 manually annotated 3D T2MRI data for an objective comparison of intervertebral disc (IVD) localization and segmentation methods• Investigate strengths and limitations of a representative selection of the state-of-the-art IVD localization and segmentation methods with a challenge setup• Results achieved by the best algorithms in this study set new frontiers for IVD localization and segmentation from MR data Experimental results show that overall the best local… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we present experimental results of the proposed pipeline for volumetric image segmentation. Two datasets, i.e., an in-house dataset consisting of 25 T1 hip MR images with limited field of view and a publicly available dataset from the MICCAI 2015 IVD localization and segmentation challenge [14], are used in our study. More specifically, first, we conduct an ablation study on the in-house hip dataset to evaluate the influence of the shuffling factors and of the underlying FCNs on the performance of the proposed pipeline.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this section, we present experimental results of the proposed pipeline for volumetric image segmentation. Two datasets, i.e., an in-house dataset consisting of 25 T1 hip MR images with limited field of view and a publicly available dataset from the MICCAI 2015 IVD localization and segmentation challenge [14], are used in our study. More specifically, first, we conduct an ablation study on the in-house hip dataset to evaluate the influence of the shuffling factors and of the underlying FCNs on the performance of the proposed pipeline.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the findings from the ablation study, we choose the 3D LP-U-net for our remaining studies. Following [14], we used Dice Overlap Coefficients (DOC), Average Surface Distance (ASD) and Hausdorff Distance (HD) as the evaluation metrics.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the nature of Catmull–Rom splines [28] further optimization can be done to achieve better interpolation results. The paper [62] presents multiple recent methods for intervertebral disc segmentation, which can be treated as a similar task, including Machine Learning and deep learning based approaches. The segmentation results presented in the paper [62] were measured with dice overlap coefficients and varied from 81.6% to 92% for different methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper [62] presents multiple recent methods for intervertebral disc segmentation, which can be treated as a similar task, including Machine Learning and deep learning based approaches. The segmentation results presented in the paper [62] were measured with dice overlap coefficients and varied from 81.6% to 92% for different methods. Comparing those results with obtained segmentation and generalization results of 90.19% and 91.37%, one can conclude that presented AAM approach provides a good segmentation performance and moreover can be applied for intervertebral discs localization and segmentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%