2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.websem.2010.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the usability of natural language query languages and interfaces to Semantic Web knowledge bases

Abstract: The need to make the contents of the Semantic Web accessible to end-users becomes increasingly pressing as the amount of information stored in ontology-based knowledge bases steadily increases. Natural language interfaces (NLIs) provide a familiar and convenient means of query access to Semantic Web data for casual end-users. While several studies have shown that NLIs can achieve high retrieval performance as well as domain independence, this paper focuses on usability and investigates if NLIs and natural lang… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
89
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
89
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, keyword search stands as a good option in terms of accessibility, learnability and efficiency, since it does not demand any expert knowledge and skills. Natural query interfaces (e.g., [48,91]) go beyond the keyword search; this is due to the fact that they interpret a query as whole and take linguistic considerations into account. However, they do not achieve much in terms of accuracy and completeness due to the ambiguity of natural language; some approaches try to alleviate this issue, such as by acquiring feedback and clarification through user dialogues (e.g., [25,58]), yet this increases the user cognitive load.…”
Section: Data Access Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, keyword search stands as a good option in terms of accessibility, learnability and efficiency, since it does not demand any expert knowledge and skills. Natural query interfaces (e.g., [48,91]) go beyond the keyword search; this is due to the fact that they interpret a query as whole and take linguistic considerations into account. However, they do not achieve much in terms of accuracy and completeness due to the ambiguity of natural language; some approaches try to alleviate this issue, such as by acquiring feedback and clarification through user dialogues (e.g., [25,58]), yet this increases the user cognitive load.…”
Section: Data Access Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing vocabularies e.g. VoID [1], DCAT 19 , Dublin Core (DC) 20 , and FOAF 21 can be used to describe data in the catalogue. The selection of a vocabulary depends upon the purpose of the catalogue and the granularity under consideration.…”
Section: Q3 How Would You Confirm Uninterrupted Data Availability Frmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even for a skilled LD practitioner it is difficult to assemble federated queries. An interface, which effectively lowers the barrier between Usability (Natural ) and Expressivity (Formal ), should be developed [20]. Such an interface evolves through 5 distinct stages -SPARQL, VQS, Single entity search, Keyword search and Google-like NL-queries.…”
Section: Q3 How Would You Confirm Uninterrupted Data Availability Frmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ways to ll out the complex web form) as results. Kaufmann and Bernstein showed the importance of guiding the user during the query formulation process [2].…”
Section: Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%