Evaluating the long-run impacts of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on US domestic airline travel

Abstract

Although the US airline industry began 2001 with 24 consecutive profitable quarters, including net profits in 2000 totaling $7.9 billion, the impact of the 9/11 event on the industry was substantial. Whereas the recession that began in early 2001 signaled the end of profitability, the 9/11 terrorist attacks pushed the industry into financial crisis after air travel dropped 20% over the September-December 2001 period compared to the same period in 2000. Given the decline in domestic air travel, an important question is whether the detrimental impact of the attacks was temporary or permanent. That is, did airline travel return to the trend that existed prior to the terrorist attacks? There are theoretical reasons to the believe that it would not. Economists have long viewed travel-mode choices as the outcome of a comparison of opportunity costs and benefits. Thus, anything that permanently raises the opportunity cost of travel, holding benefits constant, should reduce the level of travel volume. To determine whether air travel was permanently reduced, we use econometric and time-series forecasting models NOT THE PUBLISHED VERSION; this is the author's final, peer-reviewed manuscript. The published version may be accessed by following the link in the citation at the bottom of the page. 2 to generate a counter-factual forecast of air travel volume in the absence of the terrorist attacks. These dynamic forecasts are compared to actual air travel levels to determine the impact of the terrorist attacks. The findings suggest that domestic air travel did not return to the levels that would have existed in the absence of the attack.

The Role of Behavioral Responses in the Total Economic Consequences of Terrorist Attacks on U.S. Air Travel Targets

“…Blunk et al . come to a similar conclusion on reductions in air travel . Ito and Lee extend their analysis to international airline demand .…”

Structural breaks in international tourism demand: Are they caused by crises or disasters?

“…The two structural breaks identified for the US are related to the 9/11 attacks and the financial crisis. The negative impact of the 9/11 attacks on US tourism and air travel is highlighted by Goodrich (2002) and Blunk, Clark, and McGibany (2006). The recent economic and financial crisis seems to explain the structural break in 2009, as stated by Ritchie, Molinar, and Frechtling (2010).…”

Learning during a crisis: The SARS epidemic in Taiwan

“…A key question is why negligible changes in objective risk substantially alter individual choices. For instance, objectively small terrorism and health risks have large impacts on commerce (Abadie and Gardeazabal, 2003;Blunk et al, 2006;Kraipornsak, 2010). Becker and Rubinstein (2011) find that Israeli tourists respond more strongly to terrorism risk than local residents, and suggest that people who regularly confront risk may invest in the ability to surmount an emotional response.…”