2015
DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2015.1007711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the economic value of a public service—the case of the Municipal Library of Prague

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Complications connected to the library's unavailability were important in the WTP model (Hájek and Stejskal, 2015). Our results confirm the same finding.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarkssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Complications connected to the library's unavailability were important in the WTP model (Hájek and Stejskal, 2015). Our results confirm the same finding.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarkssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Our results confirm the same finding. Likewise, we confirmed that alternative costs were important factors for the library's value in all of the models proposed (this is consistent with Hájek and Stejskal, 2015). Aabø (2005b) used distance from the library, which was also an important factor of WTP.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarkssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the management of the library (and often its donors) must also aim to change services from other points of view such as public interest and economic sustainability (Kerslake & Kinnell, 1998). For the first, it is necessary to define the main functions of the libraries, while for the latter donors (often municipalities) have limited budgets each year and must know what they are financing (Stejskal & Hájek, 2015a). The example of the UK shows that not only theoretical considerations must be considered.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consumer willingness to pay (WTP) is used as an analysis tool to assess the time cost of consumers' WTW in line, unlike previous studies, in which WTP research was commonly formulated on the amount consumers are willing to pay of the overall value for one year; this is difficult for the individual to do and can lead to erroneous responses caused (Arrow et al 1993). Stejskal and Hájek (2015) highlighted that if the respondents are asked about the value of individual services without having to remember the frequency of their use for the entire year, then they give accurate results. In this study, we focus on consumers' willingness to wait for the concept, which is given as a description of the evaluated good and the expected change of the restaurants' service quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%