2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the ecological effects of social agent scenarios for a housing development in the Atlantic Forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The search for the most accurate representation of landscape functionality to guide biodiversity conservation and landscape connectivity planning remains relevant to science and a bottleneck for governmental agencies and decision-makers in general. Despite the difficulties in acquiring data in loco, the use of functional connectivity metrics, even if based on secondary data, as observed in other studies [1,2,39], was more accurate when comparing areas than applying simple structural metrics. However, the applicability of this measure faces dilemmas, such as the transposition of information from a local to a global scale, for example, data on the dispersal of species [103].…”
Section: Practical Implications For Biodiversity Conservation Planningmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The search for the most accurate representation of landscape functionality to guide biodiversity conservation and landscape connectivity planning remains relevant to science and a bottleneck for governmental agencies and decision-makers in general. Despite the difficulties in acquiring data in loco, the use of functional connectivity metrics, even if based on secondary data, as observed in other studies [1,2,39], was more accurate when comparing areas than applying simple structural metrics. However, the applicability of this measure faces dilemmas, such as the transposition of information from a local to a global scale, for example, data on the dispersal of species [103].…”
Section: Practical Implications For Biodiversity Conservation Planningmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The analysis of the landscape structure was performed using a set of metrics usually applied in the studies of landscape ecology for biological conservation [35,[39][40][41] (Table 1, Equations ( 1)-( 6)). Forest patches were assessed for their Optimal Resource Availability (ORA), calculated in ArcGIS ® (extension V-Late) using information on shape (Fsh), their size coefficients (CS), and the physiognomic importance of the forest patches (CF), an adaptation of the literature [39,42] with the inclusion of CF. Weighting CF was performed to enhance the natural habitat of the Cerrado species used in the functional analysis of this study, some of which are exclusive to this Biome.…”
Section: Measures Of Landscape Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Zeng and Wu, 2005), calculated by the sum for boundary type Length/Edge Cumulative total boundaries length (ED) FRAGSTATS ® Density -ED between the forest patch i and human-related neighboring patch k , calculated in meters by the sum for boundary type (Mcgarigal and Marks, 1995;Zeng and Wu, 2005) Table 1 -Criteria used to assess the forest conservation in historic landscapes and future scenarios. Modified from Hardt et al (2013aHardt et al ( , 2014. Tabela 1 -Critérios de avaliação da conservação da floresta nas paisagens históricas e nos cenários futuros.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to principles of landscape ecology, the processes associated with environmental conservation can be inferred from patterns of vegetation composition and distribution and land uses (Turner et al, 2001). Based on this approach, structural patterns can be assessed by using landscape metrics or indexes (McGarigal and Marks, 1995), such as quality of the forests based on size, shape, isolation, succession stage, and anthropic boundaries (Zeng and Wu, 2005;Hardt et al, 2013aHardt et al, , 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conforme já apontado na introdução desta pesquisa, o conceito passou a ser reconhecido após a Avaliação Ecossistêmica do Milênio (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment, MEA), reconhecido pela Convenção da Diversidade Biológica (CBD) e pelo setor empresarial(WRI, 2012, CEBDS, 2013. Destacam-se ainda os pesquisadores que trouxeram consistência ao assunto, conforme apontado porMunk (2015): botânico Walter Westman (na década de 70),Fisher et al (2009),Santos (2014) e Paul e Anne Ehrlich (1981). A Tabela 1 a seguir (segundoMunk, 2015), mostra um histórico do conceito sobre SE, o que demonstra o avanço perante as resistências e fragilidades da área temática.…”
unclassified