2008
DOI: 10.2514/1.30578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Technology Projections and Weight Prediction Method Uncertainty of Future Launch Vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At a confidence level of 95%, this study showed growth of 25% and 31% for the bimese and single stage concepts respectively. [146] In support of the Constellation program, a study was conducted to determine the performance requirements of the Ares V launch vehicle. Because the requirements of the Ares V depended on the entire architecture of the Constellation program, three separate uncertainties had to be accounted for: the uncertainty of the dry mass of Constellation's in-space elements, the performance of the in-space propulsion, and the performance of the Ares V. The uncertainty of the dry mass was accounted for using historical regression as discribed in Section 4.3.1.…”
Section: Use In Aerospace Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a confidence level of 95%, this study showed growth of 25% and 31% for the bimese and single stage concepts respectively. [146] In support of the Constellation program, a study was conducted to determine the performance requirements of the Ares V launch vehicle. Because the requirements of the Ares V depended on the entire architecture of the Constellation program, three separate uncertainties had to be accounted for: the uncertainty of the dry mass of Constellation's in-space elements, the performance of the in-space propulsion, and the performance of the Ares V. The uncertainty of the dry mass was accounted for using historical regression as discribed in Section 4.3.1.…”
Section: Use In Aerospace Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Range (Gillett and Stekler, 1995;Kumar and Hefner, 2000), speed (Esposito, 2004), number of passengers (Gillett and Stekler, 1995;Kumar and Hefner, 2000;Wall, 2006b), and weight of aircraft (Mavris et al, 1999;Wilhite et al, 2008) appear to have been strong drivers and technological measurements over the last few decades. These also have a strong interaction with material composite advances (Manufacturing Engineering, 2007;Fraser, 1985;Gillett and Stekler, 1995;Goehler, 1990;Kumar and Hefner, 2000;Sprague, 1988;Wilhite et al, 2008) which along with information technology (IT) advances in recent times driving analysis/design tool evolution (Fraser, 1985;Goehler, 1990;Kumar and Hefner, 2000) are increasing the rate of design aircraft changes (Ashford, 1985;Butterworth-Hayes, 2001;Fraser, 1985;Gillett and Stekler, 1995;Kumar and Hefner, 2000). Environment (Goehler, 1990;Kumar and Hefner, 2000;Masson et al, 2007;Ruffles, 2003), noise control (Gillett and Stekler, 1995;Kumar and Hefner, 2000;Ruffles, 2003) and safety concerns (Goehler, 1990;Kumar and Hefner, 2000;Ruffles, 2003) are three external influences driving design aircraft change.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis/design tool evolution is also enabling what several researchers thought were needed to move from more mature technology which was the increased need for a multidisciplinary integration of technology (Ashford, 1985;Fraser, 1985;Kumar and Hefner, 2000). This multidisciplinary approach was particularly needed with the advancements in materials (mentioned above), propulsion technology (Fraser, 1985;Kumar and Hefner, 2000;Wilhite et al, 2008), structures (closely related to materials advancements) (Manufacturing Engineering, 2007;Fraser, 1985;Kumar and Hefner, 2000;Sprague, 1988), electronic controls technologies (Fraser, 1985;Kumar and Hefner, 2000) and avionics (Fraser, 1985;Kumar and Hefner, 2000;Wilhite et al, 2008).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations