2021
DOI: 10.1080/01969722.2020.1871226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Industry 4.0 Implementation Challenges Using Interpretive Structural Modeling and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, training and continuous professional development deserve special attention and importance for Industry 4.0 (Kaya et al, 2020;Schallock et al, 2018). Especially for manufacturing companies, Bakhtari et al (2021) present the lack of leadership from the management, lack of skills for training and education programs, and lack of qualified workforce as the main challenges in implementing Industry 4.0.…”
Section: Theoretical Background Industry 40 and Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, training and continuous professional development deserve special attention and importance for Industry 4.0 (Kaya et al, 2020;Schallock et al, 2018). Especially for manufacturing companies, Bakhtari et al (2021) present the lack of leadership from the management, lack of skills for training and education programs, and lack of qualified workforce as the main challenges in implementing Industry 4.0.…”
Section: Theoretical Background Industry 40 and Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For research using respondents from expert groups, including the FISM method, the ideal number of experts is between three and seven people (Hora, 2004). Some FISM-based studies used less than ten respondents, such as Lee, Kang and Chang (2011); Kumar, Luthra and Haleem (2013); Balaji et al (2016); Das, Azmi and James (2020); Bakhtari et al (2021). Given that the results depend upon the judgments of the experts who make decisions, the respondents must possess sufficient knowledge of the study context, as indicated by the length of their hands-on experience, which should not be less than ten years in more than two BOT projects.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Czech Republic [12], Germany [13], Italy [20]). To account for this gap, different methods are employed in previous researches for barriers prioritizing, such as DEMATEL [5,21], ISM [17], ISM-ANP [18], AHP [22], Fuzzy AHP [23,24], Hesitant fuzzy AHP [25], Fuzzy MICMAC [26], Fuzzy ANP [11], GREY-DEMATEL [2,10], BWM [15]. However, most of these studies have employed methods that account for uncertainty in human decision-making; yet they do not focus on how to cater to reliability in decision-making.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This extensive literature review helped identify a total of 54 Barriers which are presented in Table 1. Environmental side effects and polluting emissions [13,15,28] Production waste [3,28] Lack of clarity in defining return on investment [11,24] Lack of clearly defined economic benefits [6,10,11,22] Long and uncertain amortization [28] Risk of false investments [3,17,28] Shortage of financial resources or investments [5,7,10,11,15,24,28] Too late investments [28] Production process-related costs [13] Government law/regulation [1,3,5,6,11,17,23,29] Lack of coordination and collaboration among supply chain partners [1,5,15] Lack of standards [1, 6, 7, 10, 11, 20, 22-24, 26, 28] Legal and Contractual Uncertainty [1,11,17,20,22,26,28] Lack of management support [1,3,<...>…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%