2013
DOI: 10.1080/15472450.2013.801714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Disturbance Robustness of Railway Schedules

Abstract: Railway traffic is operated according to a detailed schedule, specifying for each train its path through the network plus arrival and departure times at its scheduled stops. During daily operations, disturbances perturb the plan and dispatchers take action in order to keep operations feasible and to limit delay propagation. This article presents a thorough assessment of the possible application of an optimization-based framework for the evaluation of different timetables and proactive railway traffic managemen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of approaches reviewed consider those control actions in a sequential manner, generally starting from global routing. An example, global routing decision, can be taken to avoid a blocked area, local rerouting can be then chosen to spread capacity usage at bottleneck stations; orders can be decided, and all those orders result in times associated to train operations [19]. In addition, the opposite process can be followed, i.e., first computing a set of passing times and then finding a feasible route assignment; this was done, for instance, in [6] proposed for the competition [42].…”
Section: B Control Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of approaches reviewed consider those control actions in a sequential manner, generally starting from global routing. An example, global routing decision, can be taken to avoid a blocked area, local rerouting can be then chosen to spread capacity usage at bottleneck stations; orders can be decided, and all those orders result in times associated to train operations [19]. In addition, the opposite process can be followed, i.e., first computing a set of passing times and then finding a feasible route assignment; this was done, for instance, in [6] proposed for the competition [42].…”
Section: B Control Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aggregation concept introduced by Murali et al [23] is adopted to reduce the computational effort for the real-world case. In literature, Corman et al [25] used the same concept for railway traffic management. The basic concept of aggregation is the combination of a sizeable portion of the network into a single node in the graph.…”
Section: Modeling Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the robustness and stability of a timetable are matters of concern, a so-called operational simulation can be carried out, in which stochastic influences will be introduced. The robustness and stability of the investigated timetable can be derived according to statistical indicators, which are calculated based on the outputs of several rounds of simulation with different randomly generated influences [7,8]. In the area of capacity research, system performance can be evaluated through simulating randomly generated timetables for a certain operating program, a process which can, in addition, identify bottlenecks and determine the quality of an operating program [9].…”
Section: Applications Of Railway Simulation and The Limitations Of Exmentioning
confidence: 99%