2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10844-019-00548-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating content novelty in recommender systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Novelty and Diversity. Novelty measures the ability of RS to recommend items that appear novel to the user [89]. Conversely, diversity measures the ability of the RS to recommend items that are not similar to those preferred by the user in the past or that is not limited to recommending popular items only [90,91].…”
Section: Development and Evaluation Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Novelty and Diversity. Novelty measures the ability of RS to recommend items that appear novel to the user [89]. Conversely, diversity measures the ability of the RS to recommend items that are not similar to those preferred by the user in the past or that is not limited to recommending popular items only [90,91].…”
Section: Development and Evaluation Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For every test in the experimental testing results presented in the next section (Figures 6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57), 196 iterations are presented, with the proposed time slices consisting of every 28 iterations. Accordingly, seven sets (phases) of 28 iterations are implemented as time slices, with the percentage of random suggestions…”
Section: Testing Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…0% All experiments (Figures 6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43) that are not related to user selections are offline experiments. The experiments (Figures 30,31,32,33,34,35,44,45,46,47,48,49) that are related to user selections are also offline experiments but with real-time calculation of the evaluation degrees of the selections and updating of the user profiles. The results would not show major changes in the case of online tests because the evaluations are related to selections of each user and her/his reactions to the decisions of the RS.…”
Section: Experiments and Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pietro Gravino et al introduced the concept of "adjacent possible" to redesign a recommendation system to meet user demands [16]. For users, novelty is a "new" thing and differs from known things, making it a kind of user perception [17]. K. G. Saranya et al used maximum cosine and average cosine distances to measure the distance of new documents to those already known by users for verifying their novelty [18].…”
Section: Jestr Rmentioning
confidence: 99%