2012
DOI: 10.1097/aud.0b013e31825b1a69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: The questionnaire has a simple-to-use format, and it has been proven to be sufficiently sensitive for the detection of changes in each examined area. Because the questionnaire is based on observed behaviors, it can be used even when other existing tests involve tasks that are too complex for these children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Palmieri et al . () suggested that improvements shown post‐CI could be less influenced than absolute scores by factors such as IQ and age. This suggestion is consistent with our finding of fewer significant predictors here than for absolute 5‐year‐old outcomes described previously (Cupples et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Palmieri et al . () suggested that improvements shown post‐CI could be less influenced than absolute scores by factors such as IQ and age. This suggestion is consistent with our finding of fewer significant predictors here than for absolute 5‐year‐old outcomes described previously (Cupples et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another factor that might have contributed to the somewhat unexpected results lies in our use of previous findings for absolute 5-year-old outcomes to arrive at hypotheses for development. Palmieri et al (2012) suggested that improvements shown post-CI could be less influenced than absolute scores by factors such as IQ and age. This suggestion is consistent with our finding of fewer significant predictors here than for absolute 5-year-old outcomes described previously (Cupples et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Palmieri and colleagues 29 have recently advanced the Deafness and Additional Disabilities questionnaire (DADQ) as a tool developed based on the concept that an improvement in the quality of life of deaf children with additional disabilities with CI derives from increased well being in the following domains: physical, neuropsychological and social. The questionnaire consists of 5 areas: perceptual skills (perception and identification of environmental sounds, speech perception in quiet and noisy environments), preferred mode of communication (scored from 0 [behavior] to 8 [use of full sentences]), communicative behaviors (child’s communicative behaviors with familiar talkers and strangers in relation to the child’s age and language development), attention and memory (focused and selective attention to long-term memory skills) and social interaction, control of behavior and self-government (child’s behavior during interaction with family and friends and with siblings and peers, emotional needs, independence in daily activities).…”
Section: Cochlear Implantation In Children With Additional Disabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Palmieri et al 29 used the DAD questionnaire (described above) to assess the preferred way a child uses to communicate before and after cochlear implantation. The ‘preferred mode of communication’ section of the DADQ is scored from 0 to 8, where 0 denotes the lowest score and represents smiles, cries and facial expressions to communicate, and 8 denotes children who use complete sentences for communication.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…При рождении 3 детей из 1000 имеют глубокую степень сенсоневральной тугоухости (СНТ) [1][2][3][4]. Сочетание снижения слуха с задержкой речевого развития находится среди первых пяти причин задержки развития у детей [5][6][7].…”
unclassified