2013
DOI: 10.1145/2533682.2533683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating a Tool for Improving Accessibility to Charts and Graphs

Abstract: This article reports a case study of the iterative design and evaluation of a natural language-driven assistive technology, iGraph-LITE, providing people who are blind access to line graphs. Two laboratory-based usability studies involving blind and sighted people are presented with a discussion of the ensuing implementation of changes. Blind participants were found to adopt different graph interrogation strategies than sighted participants. A small field study is then reported in which a blind user who works … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other approaches have exploited auditory solutions, converting the visually-based information into an acoustic format that employs different sonification techniques and auditory parameters (e.g., pitch, loudness, timbre, or tempo) to convey the graphical content [31][32][33]. Additional efforts have explored utilizing languagebased descriptions to convey graphical information [34,35]. Auditory and verbal approaches, however, are not optimal as they are based on an interpretive medium that requires cognitive mediation and greater maintenance in attention [36].…”
Section: Current Solutions For Graphical Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches have exploited auditory solutions, converting the visually-based information into an acoustic format that employs different sonification techniques and auditory parameters (e.g., pitch, loudness, timbre, or tempo) to convey the graphical content [31][32][33]. Additional efforts have explored utilizing languagebased descriptions to convey graphical information [34,35]. Auditory and verbal approaches, however, are not optimal as they are based on an interpretive medium that requires cognitive mediation and greater maintenance in attention [36].…”
Section: Current Solutions For Graphical Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, blindfolded sighted users are often recruited for preliminary or exploratory studies, to examine the usability of non-visual interfaces (e.g. [12]).…”
Section: Performance Of Blind Vs Sighted Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response, blindfolded sighted users are recruited for preliminary or exploratory studies. Studies have shown that no major differences were identified in response times between groups of sighted and blind users (Ferres et al, [8]). However, results from the authors' study revealed that blind participants were found to select more commands, compared to their sighted counterparts.…”
Section: Participant Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%