Evaluar el bullying y el cyberbullying validación española del EBIP-Q y del ECIP-Q

Abstract

El bullying es un fenómeno de agresión injustificada que actualmente sucede en dos formatos: cara a cara y como una conducta que se realiza a través de dispositivos digitales (cyberbullying). Ampliamente estudiado tanto el primero como el segundo, hay sin embargo escaso conocimiento sobre la homogeneidad de ambos problemas y no disponemos de instrumentos de medida que permitan valorar las dos dimensiones del fenómeno: la agresión y la ciberagresión, la victimización y la cibervictimización. Este trabajo presenta la validación del European Bullying Intervention Project Questionnaire y del European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire, que evalúan la implicación en bullying y en cyberbullying, respectivamente. Ambos se han administrado a 792 estudiantes de secundaria y se han obtenido unos buenos resultados de ajuste y propiedades psicométricas. La realización de un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales ha evaluado la concurrencia y relaciones entre ambos fenómenos, encontrando la influencia del bullying sobre el cyberbullying, pero no al contrario. Estos resultados muestran la idoneidad de ambos instrumentos para evaluar de forma conjunta bullying y cyberbullying, dada su importante relación y similitud, lo que los convierten en buenas herramientas para la intervención psicoeducativa destinada a prevenir y reducir ambos fenómenos.

Psychometric properties of the triangulated version of the European Bullying Intervention Project Questionnaire: Prevalence across seven roles

“…We expected that the data would be satisfactorily explained using a factor structure of three correlated dimensions (victimization, aggression, and bystanding). As this has been found in previous studies, we also expected that traditional bullying and cyberbullying would be positively correlated and that males would score higher on aggression, while females would score higher on victimization (González‐Cabrera et al, ; Ortega‐Ruiz et al, ; Pabian & Vandebosch, ). Finally, we hypothesized that the most prevalent subroles among bystanders would be defenders and outsiders, as has been found in previous studies (González‐Cabrera et al, ; Salmivalli et al, ; Yudes‐Gómez et al, ).…”

“…The EBIPQ‐TV was used. The original tool (Ortega‐Ruiz et al, ) included 14 items, seven of which described aspects of victimization and seven accounted for aggression. This new version included seven additional items that measured bystanding.…”

“…The European Bullying Intervention Project Questionnaire (EBIPQ; Brighi et al, ; Spanish version by Ortega‐Ruiz, Del Rey, & Casas, ) is part of a leading European project that uses a cross‐cultural approach to bullying, and it has been adapted into several languages (Del Rey et al, ). The questionnaire features excellent psychometric properties but it only accounts for the two pure roles of the victim and the bully.…”

The Mediating Role of Psychological Adjustment between Peer Victimization and Social Adjustment in Adolescence

“…The peer victimization scale was selected from European Bullying Intervention Project Questionnaire (EBIPQ; Ortega et al, 2016). It comprises seven Likert-type items (e.g., “Someone has hit, kicked, or pushed me”), each with five possible responses related to frequency of involvement (0 = never ; 1 = once or twice ; 2 = once or twice a month ; 3 = about once a week ; 4 = more than once a week ).…”

Full Issue February 2017

“…The validated version in Spanish of the European Bullying Intervention Project Questionnaire (EBIPQ) (Ortega-Ruiz, Del Rey, & Casas, 2016) comprises 14 items with 5 Likert-type scale response options that measure the frequency of bullying behavior and range from "Never" to "More than once a week". The EBIQP consists of two scales.…”