2018
DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020180001e1350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eus-Fna With 19 or 22 Gauges Needles for Gastric Subepithelial Lesions of the Muscle Layer

Abstract: Background: Tissue diagnosis is required for gastric subepithelial lesions for differential diagnosis of GISTs. However, there has not been consensus about the best needle for EUS-guided sampling of these lesions. Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA for gastric subepithelial lesions of the proper muscle layer with large-bore 19 gauge needles. Methods: A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed to identify consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA with 19 and 22 gauge needles… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Endoscopic resection must remove the tumor completely (R0 resection) 22,29 . To date, no recurrence has been observed after polypectomy/mucosectomy that affects the prognosis 20 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endoscopic resection must remove the tumor completely (R0 resection) 22,29 . To date, no recurrence has been observed after polypectomy/mucosectomy that affects the prognosis 20 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this increase in the number of puncture needle options, there is no one particular needle used uniformly. Regarding needle selection, needle size has also been discussed; needle size may be a confounder, as the potential usefulness of 19-gauge [ 25 , 26 , 27 ] and 25-gauge [ 28 ] puncture needles has been shown. Although a 19-gauge needle can provide sufficient tissue, the strong puncture resistance makes it very difficult to use a 19-gauge needle, especially for small lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Massive studies have already been published regarding the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNAB. 22 - 56 A meta-analysis published in 2016 reports that EUS-guided sampling of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions is safe, but has a moderate diagnostic ability (59.9%) regardless of techniques of FNA/FNB/Tru-Cut needle biopsy or the needle diameter used for puncture. 57 Conversely, a successive meta-analysis reveals that sampling ability of FNA (80.6%) is significantly lower to that of FNB (94.9%), but increase with the help of rapid on-site evaluation.…”
Section: Eus-guided Fine-needle Aspiration/biopsymentioning
confidence: 99%