1994
DOI: 10.1097/00008469-199401001-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Europe against Cancer breast cancer screening programme in France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e One or two views depending on breast density. source in all registers is the regional morphology registers (Renaud et al, 1994;McCann et al, 1997;Bray et al, 2002). Estimation of completeness for BC has in several of the registers been reported up to 98% (Mattsson and Wallgren, 1984;Ascunce et al, 1994;Barlow et al, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e One or two views depending on breast density. source in all registers is the regional morphology registers (Renaud et al, 1994;McCann et al, 1997;Bray et al, 2002). Estimation of completeness for BC has in several of the registers been reported up to 98% (Mattsson and Wallgren, 1984;Ascunce et al, 1994;Barlow et al, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…White et al [16] analyzed 2591 women aged 40 to 49 years, without hormone therapy, and classified 24% of breasts as type 4 during the first week of the cycle and 23% during the second week, while for weeks three and four the percentage was 28%, which is a significant variation (p = 0.04) regardless of body mass index (BMI). They used the BI-RADS (Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System) classification to define breast typology: In addition, Renaud et al [17], in a European epidemiological study of a cohort of 40,293 women aged 50 to 67 years, highlighted the evolution of breast density with age, as shown in Table 2, with a higher propensity for dense breasts in younger women, and therefore a greater difficulty in detecting the presence of a tumor. A simple, non-operator-dependent method to quantify breast density could help to diagnose breast cancer as well as to qualify natural "noise" due to the variation in density during the menstrual cycle, which affects tumor detection.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Centralized facilities could permit expert interpretation, including second readings, of either films or digitized data collected at several remote locations (Shtern and Winfield, 1999;Michalowski, 2003). In France, for example, the Association pour le Dépistage des Maladies du Sein (ADEMAS) program has provided free mammography screening to women between the ages of 50 and 65 in the Strasbourg administrative regions and in surrounding small towns and rural areas since 1989 (Gairard et al, 1992;Renaud et al, 1994). This "decentralized" program was designed to accommodate existing patterns of service delivery predominated by private-practice radiologists, the lack of reliable population registries, and an apparent reluctance on the part of general practitioners to encourage women to obtain mammograms.…”
Section: Centralized and "Decentralized" Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%