2006
DOI: 10.1002/fld.1392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Euler solutions using flux‐based wave decomposition

Abstract: The Euler equations are solved for non-hydrostatic atmospheric flow problems in two dimensions using a high-resolution Godunov-type scheme. The Riemann problem is solved using a flux-based wave decomposition suggested by LeVeque. This paper describes in detail, the design and implementation of the Riemann solver used for computing the Godunov fluxes. The methodology is then validated against benchmark cases for non-hydrostatic atmospheric flows. Comparisons are made with solutions obtained from the National Ce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
88
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
15
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This shows that the thermal energy of the theta perturbation leads to the acceleration of the vertical velocity. This result agrees well with the study of Ahmad and Lindeman (2007).…”
Section: Rising Thermal Bubble Testsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This shows that the thermal energy of the theta perturbation leads to the acceleration of the vertical velocity. This result agrees well with the study of Ahmad and Lindeman (2007).…”
Section: Rising Thermal Bubble Testsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Note, however, that if the discretization method is not formally conservative, then this set should have little or no advantage over set 1. Existing mesoscale models based on this equation set includes WRF [48] and the model by Ahmad and Lindeman [1].…”
Section: Equation Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Included in this list are models such as ARPS (University of Oklahoma), COAMPS (US Navy), LM (German Weather Service), MC2 (Environment Canada), MM5 (Penn State/NCAR), NMM (National Center for Environmental Prediction), and WRF (NCAR). The only models in the literature not based on the FD method are the FV models found in [7] and [1], and the SE and DG models presented in our paper. One of the biggest advantages that SE and DG methods have over the FD method is that no terrain following coordinates of the type presented in [16] need to be included in the governing equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inviscid version of [1] is used for our analysis. This is because we are interested in assessing the current LES-like approach as a stabilizing tool that does not require further viscosity.…”
Section: Density Current In a Pseudo-3d Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%