Ethical Principles for Artificial Intelligence in National Defence

Taddeo, Mariarosaria; Blanchard, Alexander

doi:10.1007/978-3-031-09846-8_16

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In all cases where unwanted consequences can be foreseen, the mitigation is to identify these behaviours as soon as possible to intervene, stop, and correct them. As not all possible outcomes of AI systems are predictable (Holland Michel, 2020;Taddeo et al, 2022), it is also important to monitor the deployment of AI systems to assess points of failure and correct these before future deployments. To this end, it is crucial that the AI for augmented intelligence is audited to identify unethical behaviour in a timely and effective manner.…”

Section: Explainability and Accountabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence for Intelligence Analysis: a Review of the Key Challenges with Recommendations

Blanchard

Taddeo

2023

DISO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Intelligence agencies have identified artificial intelligence (AI) as a key technology for maintaining an edge over adversaries. As a result, efforts to develop, acquire, and employ AI capabilities for purposes of national security are growing. This article reviews the ethical challenges presented by the use of AI for augmented intelligence analysis. These challenges have been identified through a qualitative systematic review of the relevant literature. The article identifies five sets of ethical challenges relating to intrusion, explainability and accountability, bias, authoritarianism and political security, and collaboration and classification, and offers a series of recommendations targeted at intelligence agencies to address and mitigate these challenges.

show abstract

Section: Explainability and Accountabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%