Estudio cefalométrico comparativo entre trazados manuales y digitales con programas informáticos

Comparative Analysis of the Discrepancy in Conventional Cephalometric Tracing and Digital Cephalometric Tracing with Planmeca Romexis® Software

“…In 2009, Naoumova and Lindman (16), found that most of the landmarks that tended to be less reliable corresponded to soft tissue landmarks, which is proven in this study by a statistical difference in the Li/Pn-Dt measure. In Pellicer's research (17) in 2014, several types of software were used, and he concluded that cephalometric measurements have different significant results depending on the cephalometric points that conform them. He evaluated that those employing points located on the lower incisors and chin had the highest number of significant results in the study.…”