2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-09352011000100022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimativas de herdabilidade e tendências genéticas para características de crescimento e reprodutivas em bovinos da raça Nelore: Estimates of heritability and genetic trends for growth and reproduction traits in Nelore cattle

Abstract: Estimativas de herdabilidade e tendências genéticas para característicasde crescimento e reprodutivas em bovinos da raça Nelore 0.171 (0.01); 0.219 (0.02); 0.186 (0.03); and 0.224 (0.02) kg per year, for WW, PW, GBW, and GWP, respectively, corresponding to increases of 0.10, 0.08,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
22
4
11

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
17
22
4
11
Order By: Relevance
“…There was also a large difference in the365-day weight direct heritability estimate in this study (0.14) and those reported in five other studies (0.24-0.37, reported by GARNERO et al, 2010;AMARAL et al, 2014;ARAÚJO et al, 2014;FERREIRA et al, 2015). Finally, for 550-day weight, a heritability estimate similar to this study (0.21) was reported by Laureano et al (2011) and Amaral et al (2014) (0.18), whereas Garnero et al (2010) and Ferreira et al (2015) reported higher estimates (0.42 and 0.43, respectively). Maternal heritability estimates (Table 2) indicate that maternal effects on calves were largest for birth weight, 120 day weight and 205-dayweight.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was also a large difference in the365-day weight direct heritability estimate in this study (0.14) and those reported in five other studies (0.24-0.37, reported by GARNERO et al, 2010;AMARAL et al, 2014;ARAÚJO et al, 2014;FERREIRA et al, 2015). Finally, for 550-day weight, a heritability estimate similar to this study (0.21) was reported by Laureano et al (2011) and Amaral et al (2014) (0.18), whereas Garnero et al (2010) and Ferreira et al (2015) reported higher estimates (0.42 and 0.43, respectively). Maternal heritability estimates (Table 2) indicate that maternal effects on calves were largest for birth weight, 120 day weight and 205-dayweight.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Marcondes et al (2000), Holanda et al (2004), andAraújo et al (2014) reported maternal heritability estimates for birth weight (0.09-0.11) similar to this study (0.11). Similarly, the maternal heritability estimate for 205-day weight (0.09) was comparable to those reported by Holanda et al (2004), Silveira et al (2004), and Laureano et al (2011) for weaning weight, which was 0.08. According to Passafaro et al (2016), even though maternal effects explain only a small proportion of the phenotypic variation, they should be included in models for analysis of weight data in cattle, because their removal may result in overestimation of heritability estimates and changes in breeding values.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Other studies have also reported high variability in heritability estimates for this trait in Nellore cattle, i.e. 0.14, 0.09, 0.11, 0.26, 0.15 (Boligon et al, 2007;Faria et al, 2007;Boligon et al, 2008;Pereira et al, 2001;Laureano et al, 2011;respectively). Our results indicate that age at first calving presents moderate heritability and is recommended as a selection criterion for sexual precocity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Characteristics related to animal growth are adopted in breeding programs in beef cattle as selection criteria, because of the compensation of producers be made based on carcass weight (LAUREANO et al, 2011). Features such as weights and weight gains as well as economical and easy to be measured in a large number of individuals have genetic variability Mid magnitude in zebu cattle as Nellore and Tabapuã, promoting acceptable genetic gains (ALBUQUERQUE; MERCADANTE; ELER, 2007;SOUSA JÚNIOR et al, 2010a).…”
Section: Genetic Parameters and Growth Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%