2012
DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2012.2195724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the Instantaneously Dissipated Hysteresis Losses in Superconductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Beanʼs case, the loss at the initial ramp increases as I 2 until it reaches an inflexion point (point 1 in figure 16). The I 2 dependence is explained by partial penetration by J c , as has been shown for slabs in an applied magnetic field [35]. The inflexion point corresponds to the penetration of the two pancakes from the top (figure 17(a) profile 1).…”
Section: Ac Losssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…For Beanʼs case, the loss at the initial ramp increases as I 2 until it reaches an inflexion point (point 1 in figure 16). The I 2 dependence is explained by partial penetration by J c , as has been shown for slabs in an applied magnetic field [35]. The inflexion point corresponds to the penetration of the two pancakes from the top (figure 17(a) profile 1).…”
Section: Ac Losssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In addition, there are limitations in the measurement of instantaneous power loss. Although providing the correct loss per cycle, electrical measurements often read a false power loss signal [3,4]. Thermal measurements do not present this problem but their time response is slow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%