Estimation of the energy needs in life cycle analysis of one-way and returnable glass packaging

Returnable packaging systems and store operations: Processes, costs, and benefits

“…Effectively implemented RPS can generally provide—compared to other waste collection centers—environmental and economic benefits if retailers, customers, and policymakers work together to create incentives to keep resources in the loop. Further, the use of related dynamic interdependencies along with the theoretical underpinning of the ANT enables a comprehensive benefits analysis and consequently produces managerial implications (e.g., Mata & Costa, 2001; Van Doorsselaer & Lox, 1999).…”

“…A variety of studies assess various packaging materials and their environmental impact. Investigations of materials range from comparing single‐use and returnable glass (Mata & Costa, 2001; Van Doorsselaer & Lox, 1999) to different qualities of plastic packaging such as aseptic cartons, R‐PET, or multilayer PET (Burek et al., 2018; Cleary, 2013; Ferrara & De Feo, 2020; Stefanini et al., 2021).…”

Returnable packaging systems and store operations: Processes, costs, and benefits

“…Effectively implemented RPS can generally provide—compared to other waste collection centers—environmental and economic benefits if retailers, customers, and policymakers work together to create incentives to keep resources in the loop. Further, the use of related dynamic interdependencies along with the theoretical underpinning of the ANT enables a comprehensive benefits analysis and consequently produces managerial implications (e.g., Mata & Costa, 2001; Van Doorsselaer & Lox, 1999).…”

“…A variety of studies assess various packaging materials and their environmental impact. Investigations of materials range from comparing single‐use and returnable glass (Mata & Costa, 2001; Van Doorsselaer & Lox, 1999) to different qualities of plastic packaging such as aseptic cartons, R‐PET, or multilayer PET (Burek et al., 2018; Cleary, 2013; Ferrara & De Feo, 2020; Stefanini et al., 2021).…”

A literature review and analytical framework of the sustainability of reusable packaging

“…The more the user return rate increases, the greater the system's environmental benefits (Grimes-Casey et al, 2007;Katephap and Limnararat, 2017). However, user return rates are more vital for longer distances travelled due to the increased transportation impacts exhibited (Doorsselaer and Lox, 1999). Additionally, as the system is dependent on meeting the stakeholders' demand, system viability becomes dependant on sufficient return rates to ensure container volume is maintained (Atamer et al, 2013).…”

“…),Bortolini et al (2018),Cleary (2013),Coelho et al (2020),Ertz et al (2017),Escario et al (2020),Fuentes et al (2019),Greenwood et al (2021), Grimes-Casey et al (2007,Hekkert et al (2000b),Kunamaneni et al (2019);Lisińska-Kuśnierz (2001),Langley et al (2011), Lialiuk et al (2019,Lindh et al (2016),Long et al (2020),Madria and Tangsoc (2019), McCarthy (1993), McGlynn et al (2003a), McGlynn et al (2003b,Muranko et al (2020),Muranko et al (2021),Ratnichkina et al (2021),Tassell and Aurisicchio (2020),Tsiliyannis (2008),Wascher and Barcia (1996) Primary refillableFerrara and Plourde (2003),Lofthouse and Bhamra (2006),Lofthouse (2007),Lofthouse et al (2009),Lofthouse et al (2017), Mills et al (2018,Nessi et al (2014),Nessi et al (2015),Numata and Managi (2012), Sujai and Juwana (2021) Primary returnableCopeland et al (2013),Doorsselaer and Lox (1999), Rasmussen (1984) Secondary/tertiary returnable Accorsi et al (2020), Accorsi et al (2014), Accorsi et al (2022), Afif et al (2007), Afif et al (2009), Atamer et al (2013), Baruffaldi et al (2019), Böröcz (2022), Camps-Posino et al (…”

Survey and analysis the critical success factors in the reverse flow inventory management process for returnable packaging

“…In this sense, three research fields stand out. The first is concerned about the performance evaluation of different types of packaging, in order to define which one is the best option for each situation presented (Carrano et al, 2015;Dang and Chu, 2016;Doorsselaer and Lox, 1999;Grimes-Casey et al, 2007;Levi et al, 2011;Menesatti et al, 2012;Palsson et al, 2013;Silva et al, 2013;Singh et al, 1999;Zhang et al, 2015).…”

Returnable packaging systems and store operations: Processes, costs, and benefits

“…Effectively implemented RPS can generally provide—compared to other waste collection centers—environmental and economic benefits if retailers, customers, and policymakers work together to create incentives to keep resources in the loop. Further, the use of related dynamic interdependencies along with the theoretical underpinning of the ANT enables a comprehensive benefits analysis and consequently produces managerial implications (e.g., Mata & Costa, 2001; Van Doorsselaer & Lox, 1999).…”

“…A variety of studies assess various packaging materials and their environmental impact. Investigations of materials range from comparing single‐use and returnable glass (Mata & Costa, 2001; Van Doorsselaer & Lox, 1999) to different qualities of plastic packaging such as aseptic cartons, R‐PET, or multilayer PET (Burek et al., 2018; Cleary, 2013; Ferrara & De Feo, 2020; Stefanini et al., 2021).…”

A literature review and analytical framework of the sustainability of reusable packaging

“…The more the user return rate increases, the greater the system's environmental benefits (Grimes-Casey et al, 2007;Katephap and Limnararat, 2017). However, user return rates are more vital for longer distances travelled due to the increased transportation impacts exhibited (Doorsselaer and Lox, 1999). Additionally, as the system is dependent on meeting the stakeholders' demand, system viability becomes dependant on sufficient return rates to ensure container volume is maintained (Atamer et al, 2013).…”

“…),Bortolini et al (2018),Cleary (2013),Coelho et al (2020),Ertz et al (2017),Escario et al (2020),Fuentes et al (2019),Greenwood et al (2021), Grimes-Casey et al (2007,Hekkert et al (2000b),Kunamaneni et al (2019);Lisińska-Kuśnierz (2001),Langley et al (2011), Lialiuk et al (2019,Lindh et al (2016),Long et al (2020),Madria and Tangsoc (2019), McCarthy (1993), McGlynn et al (2003a), McGlynn et al (2003b,Muranko et al (2020),Muranko et al (2021),Ratnichkina et al (2021),Tassell and Aurisicchio (2020),Tsiliyannis (2008),Wascher and Barcia (1996) Primary refillableFerrara and Plourde (2003),Lofthouse and Bhamra (2006),Lofthouse (2007),Lofthouse et al (2009),Lofthouse et al (2017), Mills et al (2018,Nessi et al (2014),Nessi et al (2015),Numata and Managi (2012), Sujai and Juwana (2021) Primary returnableCopeland et al (2013),Doorsselaer and Lox (1999), Rasmussen (1984) Secondary/tertiary returnable Accorsi et al (2020), Accorsi et al (2014), Accorsi et al (2022), Afif et al (2007), Afif et al (2009), Atamer et al (2013), Baruffaldi et al (2019), Böröcz (2022), Camps-Posino et al (…”

Survey and analysis the critical success factors in the reverse flow inventory management process for returnable packaging

“…In this sense, three research fields stand out. The first is concerned about the performance evaluation of different types of packaging, in order to define which one is the best option for each situation presented (Carrano et al, 2015;Dang and Chu, 2016;Doorsselaer and Lox, 1999;Grimes-Casey et al, 2007;Levi et al, 2011;Menesatti et al, 2012;Palsson et al, 2013;Silva et al, 2013;Singh et al, 1999;Zhang et al, 2015).…”

Returnable packaging systems and store operations: Processes, costs, and benefits

“…Effectively implemented RPS can generally provide—compared to other waste collection centers—environmental and economic benefits if retailers, customers, and policymakers work together to create incentives to keep resources in the loop. Further, the use of related dynamic interdependencies along with the theoretical underpinning of the ANT enables a comprehensive benefits analysis and consequently produces managerial implications (e.g., Mata & Costa, 2001; Van Doorsselaer & Lox, 1999).…”

“…A variety of studies assess various packaging materials and their environmental impact. Investigations of materials range from comparing single‐use and returnable glass (Mata & Costa, 2001; Van Doorsselaer & Lox, 1999) to different qualities of plastic packaging such as aseptic cartons, R‐PET, or multilayer PET (Burek et al., 2018; Cleary, 2013; Ferrara & De Feo, 2020; Stefanini et al., 2021).…”

A literature review and analytical framework of the sustainability of reusable packaging

“…The more the user return rate increases, the greater the system's environmental benefits (Grimes-Casey et al, 2007;Katephap and Limnararat, 2017). However, user return rates are more vital for longer distances travelled due to the increased transportation impacts exhibited (Doorsselaer and Lox, 1999). Additionally, as the system is dependent on meeting the stakeholders' demand, system viability becomes dependant on sufficient return rates to ensure container volume is maintained (Atamer et al, 2013).…”

“…),Bortolini et al (2018),Cleary (2013),Coelho et al (2020),Ertz et al (2017),Escario et al (2020),Fuentes et al (2019),Greenwood et al (2021), Grimes-Casey et al (2007,Hekkert et al (2000b),Kunamaneni et al (2019);Lisińska-Kuśnierz (2001),Langley et al (2011), Lialiuk et al (2019,Lindh et al (2016),Long et al (2020),Madria and Tangsoc (2019), McCarthy (1993), McGlynn et al (2003a), McGlynn et al (2003b,Muranko et al (2020),Muranko et al (2021),Ratnichkina et al (2021),Tassell and Aurisicchio (2020),Tsiliyannis (2008),Wascher and Barcia (1996) Primary refillableFerrara and Plourde (2003),Lofthouse and Bhamra (2006),Lofthouse (2007),Lofthouse et al (2009),Lofthouse et al (2017), Mills et al (2018,Nessi et al (2014),Nessi et al (2015),Numata and Managi (2012), Sujai and Juwana (2021) Primary returnableCopeland et al (2013),Doorsselaer and Lox (1999), Rasmussen (1984) Secondary/tertiary returnable Accorsi et al (2020), Accorsi et al (2014), Accorsi et al (2022), Afif et al (2007), Afif et al (2009), Atamer et al (2013), Baruffaldi et al (2019), Böröcz (2022), Camps-Posino et al (…”

Survey and analysis the critical success factors in the reverse flow inventory management process for returnable packaging

“…In this sense, three research fields stand out. The first is concerned about the performance evaluation of different types of packaging, in order to define which one is the best option for each situation presented (Carrano et al, 2015;Dang and Chu, 2016;Doorsselaer and Lox, 1999;Grimes-Casey et al, 2007;Levi et al, 2011;Menesatti et al, 2012;Palsson et al, 2013;Silva et al, 2013;Singh et al, 1999;Zhang et al, 2015).…”