1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1085(199609)10:9<1147::aid-hyp366>3.0.co;2-s
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
Estimation of Temporal Changes in Soil Moisture Using Resistivity Method
Abstract: The temporal variation in a soil moisture profile can be studied using resistivity sounding data acquired at different times. The layered earth model based estimation of soil moisture from apparent resistivity data is a two-step non-linear inversion. Firstly, the apparent resistivity data are inverted to derive the layer resistivity variations and thicknesses and, secondly, the moisture content is estimated from these layer resistivity variations using a calibration equation. The soil moisture-resistivity prob…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
31
4
0
0
Citation Types
0
10
0
0
Year Published
2003
2025
Publication Types
Select...
30
4
1
Relationship
0
35
Authors
Journals
Cited by 35 publications
(10 citation statements)
References 6 publications
0
10
0
0
“…Contact‐based methods require direct contact with the soil. Examples of contact methods include capacitance sensors [e.g., Dean et al , 1987; Bell et al , 1987; Blonquist et al , 2005a, 2005b; Fares and Polyakov , 2006; Bogena et al , 2007], time domain reflectometry [ Topp , 2003; Robinson et al , 2003], electrical resistivity measurements [e.g., Goyal et al , 1996; Hymer et al , 2000; Zhou et al , 2001; Michot et al , 2003; Samouelian et al , 2005], heat pulse sensors [ Valente et al , 2006], fiber optic sensors [ Alessi and Prunty , 1986; Garrido et al , 1999; Fields et al , 2000; Robinson et al , 2008] and destructive sampling (e.g., gravimetric methods). These measurement techniques typically provide spatially and temporally highly resolved measurements at the point scale (e.g., vertical soil moisture profile) and the spatial‐temporal dynamics of soil moisture at the field scale.…”
Section: Methods For Measuring and Modeling Soil Moisture
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contact‐based methods require direct contact with the soil. Examples of contact methods include capacitance sensors [e.g., Dean et al , 1987; Bell et al , 1987; Blonquist et al , 2005a, 2005b; Fares and Polyakov , 2006; Bogena et al , 2007], time domain reflectometry [ Topp , 2003; Robinson et al , 2003], electrical resistivity measurements [e.g., Goyal et al , 1996; Hymer et al , 2000; Zhou et al , 2001; Michot et al , 2003; Samouelian et al , 2005], heat pulse sensors [ Valente et al , 2006], fiber optic sensors [ Alessi and Prunty , 1986; Garrido et al , 1999; Fields et al , 2000; Robinson et al , 2008] and destructive sampling (e.g., gravimetric methods). These measurement techniques typically provide spatially and temporally highly resolved measurements at the point scale (e.g., vertical soil moisture profile) and the spatial‐temporal dynamics of soil moisture at the field scale.…”
Section: Methods For Measuring and Modeling Soil Moisture
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in electronic switching means that tens of electrodes can be measured in a few tens of minutes, providing spatially exhaustive data along transects. This advanced capability has created a renewed interest in monitoring soil properties and processes using the method (Samouelian et al, 2005; Michot et al, 2003; Zhou et al, 2001; Goyal et al, 1996). The resistivity measurements provide a two‐dimensional profile and can be used to determine static properties such as subsurface structure and texture, as well as temporal changes associated with θ, or water chemistry (Samouelian et al, 2005).…”
Section: Geophysical and Mobile Sensing
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 11, adapted from Michot et al (2003), shows how the resistivity image gives a two‐dimensional slice so that θ changes can be observed spatially in the soil profile. Resistivity imaging as illustrated here is possible at submeter‐ to tens‐of‐meter scales in the field and has been used mostly for monitoring tracer tests (Singha and Gorelick, 2005) and qualitative changes in θ (Amidu and Dunbar, 2007; Goyal et al, 1996).…”
Section: Geophysical and Mobile Sensing
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oludayo, 2021;Siddiqui & Osman 2012;Cosenza et al, 2006;Sudha et al, 2009;Samouelian et al, 2005), whereas increasing water content has a reverse effect (Loke, 2004;Pozdnyakova & Pozdnyakova, 2002;Abu-Hassanein et al, 1996;Yoon & Park 2001;McCarter, 1984;Michot et al, 2000;Fukue et al, 1999). Goyal, et al (1996); Gupta and Hanks (1972) proposed an empirical linear relationship between resistivity and water content. Consequently, we also investigated the effect of these parameters on the measured resistivity to see to what extent structural units can be separated.…”
Section: Data Collection
mentioning
confidence: 99%
