2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-020-01233-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of sex using morphometric measurements performed on cranial computerized tomography scans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data obtained by Amuti et al (2020) have lower values than the data in the present study (2). Cekdemir et al reported statistically significant differences between the genders in this length in their study in which they aimed to predict gender from the calcaneus (p<0.001) (8). These data are consistent with the results of the present study (p<0.001) (Table 8).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The data obtained by Amuti et al (2020) have lower values than the data in the present study (2). Cekdemir et al reported statistically significant differences between the genders in this length in their study in which they aimed to predict gender from the calcaneus (p<0.001) (8). These data are consistent with the results of the present study (p<0.001) (Table 8).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, he stated that length and width measurements of the calcaneus were more accurate than height measurements. In another study performed on computed tomography images in the Turkish population, Cekdemir et al (2021) reported the accuracy of maxCaL as 0.911 and CaAFH as 0.878 (8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the literature, there are several studies regarding sex determination using different anatomical structures in the cranaium [7,12,27]. Besides, there is only one study regarding the association between the morphological and morphometric features of CG and sex [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%