2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of residual tensile strength of composite laminate after low-velocity impact using visually inspection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on results from previous studies, 14,16,29,30 CL-1 is most likely related to the matrix-cracking mode, and as the degree of damage becomes more severe, fiber debonding, most likely represented by C-2, occurs. Before reaching the failure loading, fiber breakage damage, most likely represented by C-3, appears.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Based on results from previous studies, 14,16,29,30 CL-1 is most likely related to the matrix-cracking mode, and as the degree of damage becomes more severe, fiber debonding, most likely represented by C-2, occurs. Before reaching the failure loading, fiber breakage damage, most likely represented by C-3, appears.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Amplitude and peak frequency (PF) were used to analyze the AE signals. 14,16 Referring to other studies of composite material damage, 15,16,29 it is found in general that common composite damage is of three types: matrix cracking, fiber debonding, and fiber breaking, so the AE signal cluster number was chosen to be three. Analyzing the data shown in Figure 5 shows that three clusters referred to as CL-1, CL-2 and CL-3 are clearly separated by amplitude and peak frequency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations