2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2012.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of grassland biomass and nitrogen using MERIS data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
37
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
37
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when this relationship was investigated at the species scale, significant results were found for Quercus ilex (EBF) plots. This is accordance with a previous study examining the (Ullah et al, 2012) and by a simple ratio index in heterogeneous rangelands (Mirik et al, 2005) at various spatial scales, 300 m and 1 m, respectively. In the literature, canopy N[%] is more often used to detect N state of foliage in forest while canopy N[area] is regularly employed in grasslands but also in crops (Clevers and Gitelson, 2013;Schlemmer et al, 2013).…”
Section: Canopy N Content Detectionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, when this relationship was investigated at the species scale, significant results were found for Quercus ilex (EBF) plots. This is accordance with a previous study examining the (Ullah et al, 2012) and by a simple ratio index in heterogeneous rangelands (Mirik et al, 2005) at various spatial scales, 300 m and 1 m, respectively. In the literature, canopy N[%] is more often used to detect N state of foliage in forest while canopy N[area] is regularly employed in grasslands but also in crops (Clevers and Gitelson, 2013;Schlemmer et al, 2013).…”
Section: Canopy N Content Detectionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In comparison, previous studies conducted in grasslands reported higher prediction accuracy e.g. by using spaceborne MTCI at 300 m spatial resolution or a simple ratio-type vegetation index computed from airborne imagery at 1 m spatial resolution, canopy N[area] was detected with r 2 values equal to 0.29 and 0.66, respectively (Mirik et al, 2005;Ullah et al, 2012). 325…”
Section: Canopy N Content Detectionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, they underlined that the spectro-temporal response of the grassland does not only depend on the practice itself, but also on the phenological stage when the practice occurs, the weather conditions, and the topography [170]. Notably, the identification of mowing events or gradual grazing management can also be derived from the numerous approaches initially used for the biomass production amount and biomass quality [171,172]. One example is Dusseux et al [173] who monitored grassland mowing and grazing in a study case in Brittany, France, using the NDVI and two biophysical variables (Leaf Area Index and fraction of vegetation cover) derived from a series of three SPOT images and field data.…”
Section: Grazing Vs Mowingmentioning
confidence: 99%