2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of anterior cruciate ligament tension from inverse dynamics data and electromyography in females during drop landing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
94
2
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
13
94
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The peak tibial anterior shear forces during sharp decelerating tasks range from 0.2 to 0.8 (3 BW). [37][38][39][40][41][42] Whereas the tasks and time points used for the analyses differ somewhat among these studies and our study, all of these tasks involve sudden deceleration motions, and the tibial anterior shear forces that we generally observed in SSL and URL are similar to those in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The peak tibial anterior shear forces during sharp decelerating tasks range from 0.2 to 0.8 (3 BW). [37][38][39][40][41][42] Whereas the tasks and time points used for the analyses differ somewhat among these studies and our study, all of these tasks involve sudden deceleration motions, and the tibial anterior shear forces that we generally observed in SSL and URL are similar to those in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Injuries to the ACL have been reported 46 as likely to occur within the first 60 milliseconds of ground contact. Thus, EMG, kinematic, and kinetic data from the first 60 milliseconds of landing performance were analyzed.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The raw EMG signal was band-pass filtered (zero-pole-gain design, eighth order, Butterworth filter) with cut-off frequencies of 10 and 400 Hz to minimize noise owing to motion artefacts and the EMG amplifier [34]. The filtered EMG signal was rectified and low-pass filtered (zero-pole-gain design, second order, Butterworth filter) with a cut-off frequency of 6 Hz [33] and a 22 ms electromechanical delay, representing the muscle time response to stimuli, applied to synchronize the processed signal with the muscle response [35]. Normalization of the processed EMG signal was then necessary to obtain a signal between zero and 1 representing muscle activation [33].…”
Section: Physiologically Plausible Muscle Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%