2002
DOI: 10.1001/jama.287.23.3130
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Estimating Treatment Effects From Observational Data

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
39
3
0
0

Citation Types

0
6
0
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
38
2
1

Relationship

3
38

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 41 publications

(6 citation statements)
references

References 22 publications

0
6
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assessed the PS generated from IPTW and matching for sufficient overlap in the distribution of the MLCC and other professional groups. We created a matched sample by matching MLCC and other professional's subjects on the logit of the PS using calipers of width equal to 0.2 of the standard deviation of the logit of the PS [19,20]. One observes that matching on the PS has reduced or eliminated many of the systematic differences between MLCC and other professional subjects that were reported in Table 1.…”
Section: Propensity Score Matching (Psm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the limitations of an observational study are often attributed to residual biases from observed confounders and potential biases from unmeasured confounders [17]. In observational studies, selection bias and residual biases have indeed been found to have been most reduced significantly by the Propensity Score(PS) method [18,19]. So PS matching calculates the likelihood that individuals will be LBW and enables comparison with normal birth weight persons who have comparable demographic and medical characteristics, or who possess a similar profile of potential confounders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…We assessed the PS generated from IPTW and matching for sufficient overlap in the distribution of the MLCC and other professional groups. We created a matched sample by matching MLCC and other professional's subjects on the logit of the PS using calipers of width equal to 0.2 of the standard deviation of the logit of the PS [19,20]. One observes that matching on the PS has reduced or eliminated many of the systematic differences between MLCC and other professional subjects that were reported in Table 1.…”
Section: Propensity Score Matching (Psm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the limitations of an observational study are often attributed to residual biases from observed confounders and potential biases from unmeasured confounders [17]. In observational studies, selection bias and residual biases have indeed been found to have been most reduced significantly by the Propensity Score(PS) method [18,19]. So PS matching calculates the likelihood that individuals will be LBW and enables comparison with normal birth weight persons who have comparable demographic and medical characteristics, or who possess a similar profile of potential confounders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…When RCT data are unavailable or it is impractical or unethical to conduct RCTs, propensity score-matched non-RCT studies based on retrospective outcome-blinded assembly of balanced cohorts may provide evidence in a timely and cost-effective manner. 8–11 Therefore, in current study, we examined the clinical effectiveness of CCBs in a propensity-matched cohort of older patients with HFpEF.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…Propensity-matched studies can be a tool for deriving bridge evidence when randomized clinical trial (RCT) based evidence is not readily available (10,11). Further, real-world HF patients are often characteristically and prognostically different from those enrolled in RCTs (12,13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.