1995
DOI: 10.1109/26.477480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the distribution of a sum of independent lognormal random variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
152
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 289 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
152
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If the K lognormal RVs are identically distributed, then the approximating lognormal moments µ Y and σ Y can even be expressed in closed-form. While the F-W method accurately models the tail portion (large values of X) of the lognormal sum pdf, it is quite inaccurate near the head portion (small values of X) of the sum pdf, especially for large values of σ Y i [10]. The mean square error in µ Y and σ Y increases with a decrease in the spread of the mean values or an increase in the spread of the standard deviations of the summands [13].…”
Section: Comparison Of Various Lognormal Sum Approximation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the K lognormal RVs are identically distributed, then the approximating lognormal moments µ Y and σ Y can even be expressed in closed-form. While the F-W method accurately models the tail portion (large values of X) of the lognormal sum pdf, it is quite inaccurate near the head portion (small values of X) of the sum pdf, especially for large values of σ Y i [10]. The mean square error in µ Y and σ Y increases with a decrease in the spread of the mean values or an increase in the spread of the standard deviations of the summands [13].…”
Section: Comparison Of Various Lognormal Sum Approximation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beaulieu et al [6], [10] have studied in detail the accuracy of several of the above methods, and shown that each method has its own advantages and disadvantages; none is unquestionably better than the others. Farley's method and, more generally, the formulae derived in [7] are strict bounds that can be quite loose for certain typical parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This function has been proposed by Farley [22] for analysing the SLN distribution in the independent and identically distributed case. We then have…”
Section: B Historical Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the 3-parameter Modified-Power-Lognormal (MPLN) distribution as our approximating function, which has been previously proposed for approximating the SLN cdf in various ways [3], [5], [13], [16], [22]. In Section II, we summarise the many arguments, some novel, for the choice of this particular distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation