2016
DOI: 10.5194/hess-20-571-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating spatially distributed soil water content at small watershed scales based on decomposition of temporal anomaly and time stability analysis

Abstract: Abstract. Soil water content (SWC) is crucial to rainfallrunoff response at the watershed scale. A model was used to decompose the spatiotemporal SWC into a time-stable pattern (i.e., temporal mean), a space-invariant temporal anomaly, and a space-variant temporal anomaly. The spacevariant temporal anomaly was further decomposed using the empirical orthogonal function (EOF) for estimating spatially distributed SWC. This model was compared to a previous model that decomposes the spatiotemporal SWC into a spatia… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, several analyses of SST datasets have considered the spatial and temporal distributions of SST in order to examine seasonal and annual SST variability and the warming signal in the YS. These studies used the empirical orthogonal function (EOF) method (Yeh and Kim 2010;Park et al 2015), which is also widely used in other disciplines (Alvarez and Pan 2016;Hu and Si 2016). These earlier studies of SST variability consider the YS as an area in its entirety and focus on relatively long time series variations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several analyses of SST datasets have considered the spatial and temporal distributions of SST in order to examine seasonal and annual SST variability and the warming signal in the YS. These studies used the empirical orthogonal function (EOF) method (Yeh and Kim 2010;Park et al 2015), which is also widely used in other disciplines (Alvarez and Pan 2016;Hu and Si 2016). These earlier studies of SST variability consider the YS as an area in its entirety and focus on relatively long time series variations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of the methods could reveal the internal spatiotemporal structures of the hydrological time series, such as stochastic method, singular value decomposition, canonical correlation, cluster analysis, empirical mode decomposition [13], artificial neural networks [14], support vector machine [15], spectrum analysis [16], wavelet analysis [17], empirical orthogonal function (EOF) [18], etc.The EOF method condenses the spatiotemporal information, reveals spatial and systematic structures, and identifies dominant variation patterns of series. It has been applied for soil water content variability in the Canadian Prairie pothole region [19], water quality variation of Nakdong River, Korea [20], terrestrial water storage change in the Tarim River basin, China [21], daily snow depth changes in Xinjiang, China [6] and other hydrological variables [22,23]. The wavelet analysis includes continuous and discrete ones.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EOF method condenses the spatiotemporal information, reveals spatial and systematic structures, and identifies dominant variation patterns of series. It has been applied for soil water content variability in the Canadian Prairie pothole region [19], water quality variation of Nakdong River, Korea [20], terrestrial water storage change in the Tarim River basin, China [21], daily snow depth changes in Xinjiang, China [6] and other hydrological variables [22,23]. The wavelet analysis includes continuous and discrete ones.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After DINEOF reconstruction, cloud free CHL values were log-transformed before we included them in figures and before statistical analysis. In Section 4, to better discern the spatial heterogeneity and the degree of coherence and temporal evolution of the CHL and SST fields, a traditional EOF analysis was applied further to the monthly, cloud-free DINEOF CHL and SST datasets, which is an approach that is also used widely in other disciplines (Hu and Si, 2016a). Each data set was organized in an M×N matrix, where M and N represented the spatial and temporal elements, respectively.…”
Section: Empirical Orthogonal Function (Eof) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%