2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Mediterranean forest parameters using multi seasonal Landsat 8 OLI imagery and an ensemble learning method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
49
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
5
49
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, this research indicated that the SWIR bands (e.g., Landsat TM spectral bands 5 and 7) play a more important role than visible and near-infrared bands. This conclusion is similar to that from previous studies on the moist tropical forests in the Amazon [4,45] and the Mediterranean forests [55]. The more important role of SWIR than near-infrared and visible spectral bands in AGB modeling may be due to the fact that SWIR is more sensitive to moisture and shade components inherent in the forest stand structure and that atmospheric conditions have less impact on spectral signatures than other shorter wavelength (e.g., near-infrared and visible) spectral bands.…”
Section: Selection Of Suitable Variables For Agb Modelingsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For example, this research indicated that the SWIR bands (e.g., Landsat TM spectral bands 5 and 7) play a more important role than visible and near-infrared bands. This conclusion is similar to that from previous studies on the moist tropical forests in the Amazon [4,45] and the Mediterranean forests [55]. The more important role of SWIR than near-infrared and visible spectral bands in AGB modeling may be due to the fact that SWIR is more sensitive to moisture and shade components inherent in the forest stand structure and that atmospheric conditions have less impact on spectral signatures than other shorter wavelength (e.g., near-infrared and visible) spectral bands.…”
Section: Selection Of Suitable Variables For Agb Modelingsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…While the number of trees (ntree) can be as many as possible (default value 100) due to the RF model being fast and not overfitting, in practice the best values for these parameters will depend on the problem and should be treated as tuning parameters. In this study, the number of regression trees grown (ntree) was adjusted based on the out-of-bag (OOB) estimated error, and the optimum number of random variables to be tested in each tree (mtry) was estimated using the tune RF function in the Random Forest package [48]. Initially, we built a RF model based on the complete set of data including all spatial, spectral, and topographic variables with varied parameter settings.…”
Section: Model Specification/parameter Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since most GPS-based ground training data collected were biased to locations across from/close to the road network, an additional 600 to 700 (varies on images) stratified random samples were also taken as reference data [28]. As several studies suggest that nonparametric machine learning classifiers such as Random Forest required a large number of reference data to attain the most favorable outcome [48,52], we combined ground training data and randomly chosen samples in order to get enough information on the land cover, while maintaining the spatial distribution of our reference data throughout the study area. Later, large portions of these samples were used as input variables for the Random Forest classifier and some were retained and used for validation for the thematic map of 2015.…”
Section: Collection Of Reference Data and Variable Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remote sensing is an effective tool to estimate the stand density. Results from relevant literature are shown in Table 4, where the remote sensing data used included airborne [40] and terrestrial LiDAR [41], optical imagery [42][43][44], and SAR data [45]. The study reported by Lee and Lucas [40] is most directly comparable to ours as they also implemented airborne LiDAR data (Optech ALTM 1020), while the stand densities were estimated by computing the height-scaled crown openness index for LiDAR data of white cypress pine in the coniferous forest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%