2013
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mst100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Gene Gain and Loss Rates in the Presence of Error in Genome Assembly and Annotation Using CAFE 3

Abstract: Current sequencing methods produce large amounts of data, but genome assemblies constructed from these data are often fragmented and incomplete. Incomplete and error-filled assemblies result in many annotation errors, especially in the number of genes present in a genome. This means that methods attempting to estimate rates of gene duplication and loss often will be misled by such errors and that rates of gene family evolution will be consistently overestimated. Here, we present a method that takes these error… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
665
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 698 publications
(692 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
665
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Pfam domain counts in B. platifrons were compared against the background average domain counts of the 9 non-mussel mollusks (that is, species other than B. platifrons and M. philippinarum). In addition, OrthoMCL 39 was applied to cluster gene families and CAFÉ version 3.1 was applied to determine the significance of gene family expansion/contraction 47 . For each gene family, CAFÉ generated a family-wide P value, with a significant P value indicating a possible gene-family expansion or contraction event.…”
Section: Phylogenomics Protein Sequences Of the Nine Published Or Pumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Pfam domain counts in B. platifrons were compared against the background average domain counts of the 9 non-mussel mollusks (that is, species other than B. platifrons and M. philippinarum). In addition, OrthoMCL 39 was applied to cluster gene families and CAFÉ version 3.1 was applied to determine the significance of gene family expansion/contraction 47 . For each gene family, CAFÉ generated a family-wide P value, with a significant P value indicating a possible gene-family expansion or contraction event.…”
Section: Phylogenomics Protein Sequences Of the Nine Published Or Pumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A family-wide P value less than 0.01 and a branch/node Viterbi P value less than 0.001 was considered as a signature of gene family expansion/contraction for a specific gene family and specific species, respectively, as recommended for CAFÉ version 3.1 in ref. 47 . Proteomics characterization.…”
Section: Phylogenomics Protein Sequences Of the Nine Published Or Pumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important requirement for this approach is the quality of sequencing and annotation, especially for a large gene family, as sequencing errors and misannotations can lead to false positives when testing for positive selection (Han et al, 2013). We profit from a recently developed pipeline designed to automatically perform different steps of the analysis (Fischer et al, 2014).…”
Section: Studying Selection Pressures In a Large And Dynamic Gene Familymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supplemental Table S20 summarizes the number of reads, mapping percentage, and coverage prior to and after removing PCR duplicates. Assessment of canonical pathway enrichment for genes linked with deleted or duplicated bases utilized a hypergeometric test (P < 0.05) against the human genome enabled in WebGestalt (Wang et al 2013), while examination of gene family expansion and contraction used the updated CAFE3 (see Supplemental Methods; Han et al 2013). …”
Section: Structural Variation Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%