2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating early season growth and biomass of field pea for selection of divergent ideotypes using proximal sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2021, plant height was assessed as CHM, which is an estimation of crop height using UAV imagery (Banerjee et al, 2020). CHM correlated positively with YOR and yield mostly at flowering, suggesting that this trait can be assessed using field-based phenotyping remote sensing as has been also done recently in field peas (Tefera et al, 2022). Lentil plant height is even more important under stressful conditions, as it tends to be reduced in such environments (Lake and Sadras, 2021) and assessing plant height with remote sensing can be an efficient alternative for a breeding program.…”
Section: Crop Architecturementioning
confidence: 93%
“…In 2021, plant height was assessed as CHM, which is an estimation of crop height using UAV imagery (Banerjee et al, 2020). CHM correlated positively with YOR and yield mostly at flowering, suggesting that this trait can be assessed using field-based phenotyping remote sensing as has been also done recently in field peas (Tefera et al, 2022). Lentil plant height is even more important under stressful conditions, as it tends to be reduced in such environments (Lake and Sadras, 2021) and assessing plant height with remote sensing can be an efficient alternative for a breeding program.…”
Section: Crop Architecturementioning
confidence: 93%
“…By digitizing these structures, manual measurements can be avoided and performed through efficient algorithms, thus reducing the response time of in-field monitoring. Some of the most relevant studies regarding vegetation properties address the estimation of biomass (Walter et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2021), phenotyping (Tefera et al, 2022) as well as coarse-grained and leaf-related parameters (Rosell et al, 2009). Furthermore, the reconstruction of trees represents a baseline for predicting and modeling the state of an environment, thus providing a background for precision agriculture, soil, forestry (Nită, 2021) and urban management (Gobeawan et al, 2021).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These applications rely on retrieving image-based features that can be indirectly associated with yield. A large body of literature reports the accuracy of vegetation indices (VIs) in predicting yield and other important agronomic and stress-tolerant traits at breeding plot level for multiple crops such as wheat (Kyratzis et al, 2017;Hassan et al, 2018;Hassan et al, 2019;Li et al, 2019;Fu et al, 2020;Shafiee et al, 2021;Zeng et al, 2021), soybean (Zhang et al, 2019;Maimaitijiang et al, 2020a;Maimaitijiang et al, 2020b;Roth et al, 2022;Santana et al, 2022), maize (Buchaillot et al, 2019;Adak et al, 2021;Sankaran et al, 2021), and pulse crops (Sankaran et al, 2018;Marzougui et al, 2019;Vargas et al, 2019;Valencia-Ortiz et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2021;Tefera et al, 2022). While yield prediction using UAS-based sensing approaches has shown promising results, scaling up the application to cover large areas and/or multienvironment trials is still a major challenge (Zhang et al, 2020;Jin et al, 2021;Smith et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%