2017
DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2017.1298985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Available Abandoned Cropland in the United States: Possibilities for Energy Crop Production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
23
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of the studies identified AAL ( Figure 6) using object-based image analysis (OBIA) [32,35,49,54,56,76] and multitemporal analysis (MA) [47,52,58,61,74] methods. Most of the studies related to these methods combined different approaches.…”
Section: Methods For Identification Of Aal Classesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the studies identified AAL ( Figure 6) using object-based image analysis (OBIA) [32,35,49,54,56,76] and multitemporal analysis (MA) [47,52,58,61,74] methods. Most of the studies related to these methods combined different approaches.…”
Section: Methods For Identification Of Aal Classesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less is understood on how warm-season perennial grasses will perform across a variety of landscape conditions including marginal land. The definition of marginal land varies across publications; however, it is based on crop production potential and economic return (underproductive, inaccessible, barren, or set aside land), as well as the environmental risk or degradation associated with crop production or other activities (Baxter & Calvert, 2017;Gopalakrishnan, Negri, & Snyder, 2011;Peterson & Galbraith, 1932;Ssegane et al, 2016). Many studies have discussed the importance and potential of warm-season grass production on marginal land for bioenergy (Gopalakrishnan et al, 2011;Kludze et al, 2013;Quinn et al, 2015) but few studies have actually assessed their production potential on marginal land (Boe et al, 2009;Gelfand et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By 1985 on the nature axis, Tennessee, the last of the study states with considerable cropland pasture, surpasses Alabama converting to commodity annuals, catching up to Texas and Oklahoma. By 2000, we see intimations of what would be, outside specific counties (Baxter and Colvert 2017), the effective end of cropland pasture by 2015, for which the TPS would compress to a near vertical line. Along the industry axis in the bottom TPS, the relative positions across the states appear largely maintained even in and out of the spike in industry alienation of the 1980s crisis, although there is some spread for 1985.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%