2011
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/325/1/012003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ESS-Bilbao light-ion linear accelerator and neutron source: design and applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[10], where is stated that 600 MeV comes to be the lowest practical proton energy, account made of the optimal power deposition density in the spallation target. As a reference, it can either be taken as similar to the accelerator designed for the MYRRHA project [29], duly adapted for operation in pulsed mode, or some other high-current pulsed proton accelerators being nowadays under development [30]. In short, such an accelerator can be though of as consisting in a proton injector composed by a proton source plus accelerating structures such as radiofrequency-quadrupole and a drift-tube-linac, which drive the beam up to 50 MeV, followed by a fully modular superconducting linac to accelerate the beam up to the sought energy.…”
Section: Basic Design Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10], where is stated that 600 MeV comes to be the lowest practical proton energy, account made of the optimal power deposition density in the spallation target. As a reference, it can either be taken as similar to the accelerator designed for the MYRRHA project [29], duly adapted for operation in pulsed mode, or some other high-current pulsed proton accelerators being nowadays under development [30]. In short, such an accelerator can be though of as consisting in a proton injector composed by a proton source plus accelerating structures such as radiofrequency-quadrupole and a drift-tube-linac, which drive the beam up to 50 MeV, followed by a fully modular superconducting linac to accelerate the beam up to the sought energy.…”
Section: Basic Design Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%