2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-010-1534-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erythropoietin: a novel treatment for traumatic optic neuropathy—a pilot study

Abstract: Intravenous erythropoietin may be a new effective and safe treatment for patients with indirect TON.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(56 reference statements)
1
44
2
Order By: Relevance
“…81 Erythropoietin In a study comparing intravitreal erythropoietin (EPO) and conservative management for patients with indirect TON, patients treated with EPO showed a greater improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). 82 This was supported by studies showing the neuroprotective and neuroregenerative effects of EPO in axotomized rats. 83 …”
Section: Crystallinmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…81 Erythropoietin In a study comparing intravitreal erythropoietin (EPO) and conservative management for patients with indirect TON, patients treated with EPO showed a greater improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). 82 This was supported by studies showing the neuroprotective and neuroregenerative effects of EPO in axotomized rats. 83 …”
Section: Crystallinmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…61 Seven patients with indirect traumatic optic neuropathy were given 10 000 units per day of recombinant EPO for 3 days and compared with placebo. The patients showed significant clinical improvement.…”
Section: Current Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19][20][21] Furthermore, EPO was reported to protect optic nerve in patients with traumatic optic neuropathy, clinically. 25 They found visual acuity increase in these patients after the systemic EPO application. This finding made us wonder whether it can protect ON in patients with CRF undergoing PD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%