1926
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.1926.02370150085009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erythema Elevatum Diutinum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1929
1929
1962
1962

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…clearly separated erythema elevatum diuti¬ num from granuloma annulare, their reports were apparently ignored, and erythema elevatum diutinum was still regarded as an obscure dermatosis allied to granuloma annulare. Trimble (1926) thought that the so-called Bury type was a disease not related to erythema elevatum diutinum. He opined, however, that erythema elevatum diutinum was a distinct clinical entity and not in any sense the same as granuloma annulare.…”
Section: Report Of a Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…clearly separated erythema elevatum diuti¬ num from granuloma annulare, their reports were apparently ignored, and erythema elevatum diutinum was still regarded as an obscure dermatosis allied to granuloma annulare. Trimble (1926) thought that the so-called Bury type was a disease not related to erythema elevatum diutinum. He opined, however, that erythema elevatum diutinum was a distinct clinical entity and not in any sense the same as granuloma annulare.…”
Section: Report Of a Casementioning
confidence: 99%