2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error processing in the adolescent brain: Age-related differences in electrophysiology, behavioral adaptation, and brain morphology

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
34
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
6
34
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with our present results, several studies have found no association between ERN and PES in worried students (Hajcak and Simons, 2002;Hajcak et al, 2003a). However, others have detected such a relationship (West and Travers, 2008;Overbye et al, 2019). Taken together, although our data suggest that higher neural responses to error awareness are related to more adaptive adjustments after errors, this result should be carefully interpreted based on the relatively small correlation coefficient (partial r = −0.349).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Consistent with our present results, several studies have found no association between ERN and PES in worried students (Hajcak and Simons, 2002;Hajcak et al, 2003a). However, others have detected such a relationship (West and Travers, 2008;Overbye et al, 2019). Taken together, although our data suggest that higher neural responses to error awareness are related to more adaptive adjustments after errors, this result should be carefully interpreted based on the relatively small correlation coefficient (partial r = −0.349).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Although the role of cognition in nicotine dependence has aroused great interest (40), and in the cognitive neuroscience of the Pe (37,(41)(42)(43), it seems to be the first study to show that Pe is sensitive to acute abstinence from smoking. Previous ERP studies have shown that the Pe possibly reflects the error awareness (44), motivational significance (45), or emotional assessment of an error (46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a series of studies using a visual discrimination task revealed that 5-year-olds overestimated their performance and were less likely to rate their performance as worse on more difficult trials than easier trials compared to adults (O'Leary & Sloutsky, 2017, 2019). Similarly, post-error slowing and post-error improvement in accuracy, which reflect behavioral adjustment following error detection, increased with age during a flanker task among 8- to 19-year-olds (Overbye et al, 2019). Finally, a study with 7- to 25-year-olds reported that age was positively related to amplitude of an electrophysiological index of internal response monitoring, the error-related negativity (ERN), during a flanker task (Davies, Segalowitz, & Gavin, 2004).…”
Section: Response Monitoring and The Underlying Neural Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%