ERRATUM: “THE EIGHTH DATA RELEASE OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY: FIRST DATA FROM SDSS-III” (2011, ApJS, 193, 29)

Aihara, H.; Prieto, C. Allende; An, Deokkeun; Anderson, Scott F.; Aubourg, É.; Balbinot, E.; Beers, Timothy C.; Berlind, Andreas A.; Bickerton, Steven J.; Bizyaev, Dmitry; Blanton, MichaelR.; Bochanski, John J.; Bolton, A.; Bovy, Jo; Brandt, W. N.; Brinkmann, J.; Brown, Peterj; Brownstein, Joel R.; Busca, N. G.; Campbell, H.; Carr, Michael; Chen, Yanmei; Chiappini, Cristina; Comparat, Johan; Connolly, N.; Cortês, Marina; Croft, Rupert A. C.; Cuesta, A.; Costa, L. N. da; Davenport, James R. A.; Dawson, Kyle; Dhital, Saurav; Ealet, A.; Ebelke, G.; Edmondson, Edward M.; Eisenstein, Daniel J.; Escoffier, S.; Esposito, M.; Evans, Michael L.; Fan, Xiaohui; Castellá, Bruno Femenía; Font-Ribera, Andreu; Frinchaboy, Peter M.; Ge, Jian; Gillespie, Bruce; Gilmore, G.; Hernández, J. I. González; Gott, J. Richard; Gould, Andrew; Grebel, Eva K.; Gunn, James E.; Hamilton, J. C.; Harding, Paul; Harris, David W.; Hawley, Suzanne L.; Hearty, Frederick R.; Ho, Shirley; Hogg, David W.; Holtzman, Jon A.; Honscheid, K.; Inada, Naohisa; Ivans, Inese I.; Jiang, Linhua; Johnson, Jennifer A.; Jordan, C.; Jordan, Wendellp; Kazin, Eyal; Kirkby, D.; Klaene, Mark A.; Knapp, G. R.; Kneib, Jean-Paul; Kochanek, C. S.; Koesterke, L.; Kollmeier, Juna A.; Krön, Richard G.; Lampeitl, H.; Lang, Dustin; Goff, J. M. Le; Lee, Young Sun; Lin, Yen Ting; Long, Daniel C.; Loomis, Craig; Lucatello, S.; Lundgren, Britt; Lupton, Robert H.; Ma, Zhibo; MacDonald, Nicholas; Mahadevan, Suvrath; Maia, Marcioa G.; Makler, M.; Malanushenko, Elena; Malanushenko, Viktor; Mandelbaum, Rachel; Maraston, Claudia; Margala, Daniel; Masters, Karen L.; McBride, Cameron K.; McGehee, P.; McGreer, I. D.; Ménard, Brice; Miralda-Escudé, Jordi; Morrison, Heather; Mullally, Fergal; Muna, Demitri; Munn, Jeffrey A.; Murayama, Hitoshi; Myers, Adam D.; Naugle, Tracy; Neto, A. Fausti; Nguyen, Duy Cuong; Nichol, R. C.; O’Connell, R. W.; Ogando, R. L. C.; Olmstead, Matthewd; Oravetz, Daniel; Padmanabhan, Nikhil; Palanque-Delabrouille, N.; Pan, Kaike; Pandey, Parul; Pâris, Isabelle; Percival, Will J.; Petitjean, P.; Pfaffenberger, Robert; Pforr, Janine; Phleps, S.; Pichon, Christophe; Pieri, Matthew M.; Prada, Francisco; Price-Whelan, Adrianm; Jordanraddick, M.; Ramos, B.; Reylé, C.; Rich, J.; Richards, G. T.; Rix, H. W.; Robin, A. C.; Rocha-Pinto, Helio J.; Rockosi, Constance M.; Roe, Natalie A.; Rollinde, Emmanuel; Ross, A. J.; Ross, N.; Rossetto, Bruno M.; Sánchez, Arielg; Sayres, Conor; Schlegel, David J.; Schlesinger, Katharine J.; Schmidt, Sarah J.; Schneider, D.; Sheldon, E.; Shu, Y.; Simmerer, Jennifer; Simmons, Audrey; Sivarani, T.; Snedden, Stephanie A.; Sobeck, Jennifer; Steinmetz, Matthias; Strauss, Michael A.; Szalay, Alexander S.; Tanaka, Masayuki; Thakar, Aniruddha R.; Thomas, Daniel; Tinker, J.; Tofflemire, B. M.; Tojeiro, Rita; Tremonti, Christy; Vandenberg, Jan; Magaña, Mariana Vargas; Verde, Licia; Vogt, Nicole P.; Wake, David A.; Wang, Ji; Weaver, B. A.; Weinberg, David H.; White, Martin; White, Simon D. M.; Yanny, B.; Yasuda, Naoki; Yèche, Ch; Zehavi, Idit

doi:10.1088/0067-0049/195/2/26

Cited by 433 publications

(526 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

522

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Four of the seven newly discovered SNe Ia-CSM in PTF (PTF10htz, PTF10iuf, PTF11dsb, and PTF12hnr) are also found in what are likely late-type spiral hosts, all of which have luminosities similar to that of the MW (−20.6 mag < M r < −19.2 mag). The remaining three PTF SNe Ia-CSM (PTF10yni, PTF11hzx, and PTF12efc) do not have detectable hosts in SDSS DR8 (Aihara et al 2011) or in our deep stacks of PTF search images. This implies that they are low-luminosity galaxies with M r −18 mag.…”

Section: Host Galaxies Of Sne Ia-csmmentioning

confidence: 77%

“…Using the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) and the SDSS Data Release 8 (DR8; Aihara et al 2011), we find that the hosts of the four other non-PTF SNe Ia-CSM discussed in this work are also late-type galaxies. Three of the four have relatively low luminosities (−19.3 mag < M r < −18.1 mag), while the host of SN 2008J appears to be consistent with MW luminosity (much like the host of SN 1999E).…”

Section: Host Galaxies Of Sne Ia-csmmentioning

confidence: 78%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Type Ia Supernovae Strongly Interacting with Their Circumstellar Medium

Silverman¹,

Nugent

Gal‐Yam

et al. 2015

Proc. IAU

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Owing to their utility for measurements of cosmic acceleration, Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) are perhaps the beststudied class of SNe, yet the progenitor systems of these explosions largely remain a mystery. A rare subclass of SNe Ia shows evidence of strong interaction with their circumstellar medium (CSM), and in particular, a hydrogenrich CSM; we refer to them as SNe Ia-CSM. In the first systematic search for such systems, we have identified 16 SNe Ia-CSM, and here we present new spectra of 13 of them. Six SNe Ia-CSM have been well studied previously, three were previously known but are analyzed in depth for the first time here, and seven are new discoveries from the Palomar Transient Factory. The spectra of all SNe Ia-CSM are dominated by Hα emission (with widths of ∼2000 km s −1 ) and exhibit large Hα/Hβ intensity ratios (perhaps due to collisional excitation of hydrogen via the SN ejecta overtaking slower-moving CSM shells); moreover, they have an almost complete lack of He i emission. They also show possible evidence of dust formation through a decrease in the red wing of Hα 75-100 days past maximum brightness, and nearly all SNe Ia-CSM exhibit strong Na i D absorption from the host galaxy. The absolute magnitudes (uncorrected for host-galaxy extinction) of SNe Ia-CSM are found to be −21.3 mag M R −19 mag, and they also seem to show ultraviolet emission at early times and strong infrared emission at late times (but no detected radio or X-ray emission). Finally, the host galaxies of SNe Ia-CSM are all late-type spirals similar to the Milky Way, or dwarf irregulars like the Large Magellanic Cloud, which implies that these objects come from a relatively young stellar population. This work represents the most detailed analysis of the SN Ia-CSM class to date.

show abstract

Section: Host Galaxies Of Sne Ia-csmmentioning

confidence: 77%

Section: Host Galaxies Of Sne Ia-csmmentioning

confidence: 78%

Type Ia Supernovae Strongly Interacting with Their Circumstellar Medium

Silverman¹,

Nugent

Gal‐Yam

et al. 2015

Proc. IAU

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The NSA is a collection of galaxies in the local Universe (z ≤ 0.055) based primarily on the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 8 (SDSS DR8) spectroscopic catalog (York et al 2000;Aihara et al 2011) and contains about 140,000 galaxies within the footprint of SDSS DR8. The catalog contains galaxy parameters and images from a combination of several catalogs across multiple wavelengths: SDSS DR8, NASA Extragalactic Database, Six-degree Field Galaxy Redshift Survey, Two-degree Field Galaxy Redshift Survey, ZCAT, WISE, 2MASS, GALEX, and ALFALFA.…”

Section: Nasa-sloan Atlasmentioning

confidence: 99%

On the Star Formation Properties of Void Galaxies

Moorman

Moreno

White

et al. 2016

ApJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We measure the star formation properties of two large samples of galaxies from the SDSS in large-scale cosmic voids on time scales of 10 Myr and 100 Myr, using Hα emission line strengths and GALEX F U V fluxes, respectively. The first sample consists of 109,818 optically selected galaxies. We find that void galaxies in this sample have higher specific star formation rates (SSFRs; star formation rates per unit stellar mass) than similar stellar mass galaxies in denser regions. The second sample is a subset of the optically selected sample containing 8070 galaxies with reliable H I detections from ALFALFA. For the full H I detected sample, SSFRs do not vary systematically with large-scale environment. However, investigating only the H I detected dwarf galaxies reveals a trend towards higher SSFRs in voids. Furthermore, we estimate the star formation rate per unit H I mass (known as the star formation efficiency; SFE) of a galaxy, as a function of environment. For the overall H I detected population, we notice no environmental dependence. Limiting the sample to dwarf galaxies still does not reveal a statistically significant difference between SFEs in voids versus walls. These results suggest that void environments, on average, provide a nurturing environment for dwarf galaxy evolution allowing for higher specific star formation rates while forming stars with similar efficiencies to those in walls.Subject headings: galaxies: star formation cosmology: large-scale structure of the universe -cosmology: observations

show abstract

“…As the VCC coordinates are not always particularly accurate, we checked Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) imaging at the reported positions and corrected these to the centres of the corresponding SDSS galaxies from DR8 1 (Aihara et al 2011); clearly we need accurate centre positions if 1 www.sdss3.org/dr8 we are to confirm nuclear emission, in particular. In a few cases, the VCC positions appeared to be significantly in error so we took the position to be that of the nearest dwarf-looking object visible on the SDSS image.…”

Section: Virgo Dwarfsmentioning

confidence: 99%

X-ray sources in dwarf galaxies in the Virgo cluster and the nearby field

Papadopoulou

Phillipps

Young

2016

Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The extent to which dwarf galaxies represent essentially scaled down versions of giant galaxies is an important question with regards the formation and evolution of the galaxy population as a whole. Here, we address the specific question of whether dwarf galaxies behave like smaller versions of giants in terms of their X-ray properties. We discuss two samples of around 100 objects each, dwarfs in the Virgo cluster and dwarfs in a large Northern hemisphere area. We find nine dwarfs in each sample with Chandra detections. For the Virgo sample, these are in dwarf elliptical (or dwarf lenticular) galaxies and we assume that these are (mostly) low-mass X-ray binaries (LMXB) [some may be nuclear sources]. We find a detection rate entirely consistent with scaling down from massive ellipticals, viz. about one bright (i.e. L X > 10 38 erg s −1 ) LMXB per 5 × 10 9 M of stars. For the field sample, we find one (known) Seyfert nucleus, in a galaxy which appears to be the lowest mass dwarf with a confirmed X-ray emitting nucleus. The other detections are in star-forming dwarf irregular or blue compact dwarf galaxies and are presumably high-mass X-ray binaries (HMXB). This time, we find a very similar detection rate to that in large late-type galaxies if we scale down by star formation rate, roughly one HMXB for a rate of 0.3 M per year. Nevertheless, there does seem to be one clear difference, in that the dwarf late-type galaxies with X-ray sources appear strongly biased to very low metallicity systems.

show abstract

ERRATUM: “THE EIGHTH DATA RELEASE OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY: FIRST DATA FROM SDSS-III” (2011, ApJS, 193, 29)

Cited by 433 publications

References 5 publications

Type Ia Supernovae Strongly Interacting with Their Circumstellar Medium

Type Ia Supernovae Strongly Interacting with Their Circumstellar Medium

On the Star Formation Properties of Void Galaxies

X-ray sources in dwarf galaxies in the Virgo cluster and the nearby field

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About