2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.67.119902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: “Effect of asymmetric strange seas and isospin-violating parton distribution functions onsin2θWmeasured in the NuTeV experiment” [Phys. Rev. D65, 111103

Abstract: The following changes should be noted.A new measurement of the neutron excess is reported from an updated material assay of the NuTeV target, ␦Nϭ5.74 Ϯ0.02%. This new value, while consistent with the previously reported neutron excess, is more precise.The definition of the neutron excess is clarified. The expression on page 111103-2 should read ␦Nϵ(AϪ2Z)/A.A sign mistake in the second term in Eq. ͑7͒ is corrected. In addition, this second term should instead have been expressed as the fractional difference in … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
68
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
68
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar overestimates are obtained for the nonperturbative (hadronic) bag model results [5]. Furthermore, the frequently used [6,7,24,26] expression for δR − s in (8) due to a strangeness asymmetry represents already a priori an overestimate since it results from treating naively the CC transition (−) s → (−) c without a kine-matic suppression factor for massive charm production [3]. Nevertheless one obtains ∆s 2 W | strange = δR − s = −0.0021 using [25] S − = 0.00165, instead of ∆s 2 W | strange = −0.0017 in (6), as derived from (4).…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar overestimates are obtained for the nonperturbative (hadronic) bag model results [5]. Furthermore, the frequently used [6,7,24,26] expression for δR − s in (8) due to a strangeness asymmetry represents already a priori an overestimate since it results from treating naively the CC transition (−) s → (−) c without a kine-matic suppression factor for massive charm production [3]. Nevertheless one obtains ∆s 2 W | strange = δR − s = −0.0021 using [25] S − = 0.00165, instead of ∆s 2 W | strange = −0.0017 in (6), as derived from (4).…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…Possible sources for this discrepancy (see, for example, [3,4,5,6,7]) include, among other things, isospin-symmetry violating contributions of the parton distributions in the nucleon, i.e., nonvanishing δq v and δq defined via…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…effects due to a non-isoscalar target, higher-twists, charm production, etc. ; several sources, spanning from new physics to nuclear effects, have been proposed to explain this discrepancy (see, for instance, [182][183][184][185]). Among them isospin-symmetry violating contributions of the parton distributions in the nucleon and effects caused by the strange sea asymmetry s =s turn out to be relevant.…”
Section: Isospin Violations and The Nutev Anomalymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1.5 within the frame- Figure 2.36: The functionals describing the shift in the NuTeV s 2 W measurement caused by isospin and strange sea asymmetries in the nucleon as presented in [182].…”
Section: Isospin Violations and The Nutev Anomalymentioning
confidence: 99%