2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2003.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ERK(MAPK) activity as a determinant of tumor growth and dormancy; regulation by p38(SAPK)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

27
432
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 343 publications
(462 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
27
432
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…20 Together these findings suggest that p38 does not play a major role in the development or progression of melanocytic tumors and that the observed activation is rather an effector of other signaling pathways. In support of this, Aguirre-Ghiso et al 11 suggested that the p38 pathway may be altered or dysfunctional in melanomas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…20 Together these findings suggest that p38 does not play a major role in the development or progression of melanocytic tumors and that the observed activation is rather an effector of other signaling pathways. In support of this, Aguirre-Ghiso et al 11 suggested that the p38 pathway may be altered or dysfunctional in melanomas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…11,[27][28][29][30][31][32] We observed a strong significant positive association between the activation status of cytoplasmic JNK, p38, and ERK1/2 in superficial spreading melanomas as well as an association between activation of Akt and p38 in the cytoplasm. In a study by Pedram et al 32 expression of vascular endothelial growth factor was shown to induce a positive ERK1/2-JNK crosstalk in endothelial cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our present work suggests that the suppression of migration and invasion by Pdcd4 is, at least in part, brought about by a downregulation of the urokinase receptor (u-PAR), which, together with its binding enzyme u-PA and its specific inhibitor PAI-1, has been well established as a proteolytic system promoting invasion/metastasis and a poor clinical prognosis in diverse cancers (Duffy, 1987;Blasi, 1993;Heiss et al, 1996;Muehlenweg et al, 2001). Although it is well established that u-PAR is regulated by many growth factors, oncogenes (Boyd and Brattain, 1989;Lengyel et al, 1996;Allgayer et al, 1999a-c) and signaling cascades promoting proliferation/progression (AguirreGhiso et al, 2001;Aguirre-Ghiso et al, 2003;Ahmed et al, 2003), no tumor suppressor gene has been identified so far regulating u-PAR gene expression (Fuchs and Allgayer, 2003). According to previous studies, the regulation of u-PAR gene expression has largely been observed at the transcriptional level (Wang et al, 1994;Wagner et al, 1995;Lengyel et al, 1996), and correspondingly, we showed that Pdcd4 reduces u-PAR promoter activity, and that siPdcd4 induces u-PAR mRNA, in our cell lines studied, suggesting transcriptional regulation.…”
Section: Pdcd4 Regulates Invasion and U-par Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(76) Recent findings indicated that androgen-independent proliferation of prostate cancer cells may be, at least in part, regulated via p38 activation. (77) The molecular mechanism of AR-MAPK pathway interactions may be a combination of MAPK phosphorylation of AR to sensitize it to 5a-dihydrotestosterone (DHT), facilitation of AR entry into the nucleus, and MAPK phosphorylation of an AR coactivator, such as SRC-1, to increase AR transcriptional activity (e.g.…”
Section: Mapk Signalingmentioning
confidence: 99%