2020
DOI: 10.1089/photob.2019.4752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Er,Cr:YSGG Laser in the Debonding of Feldspathic Porcelain Veneers: An In Vitro Study of Two Different Fluences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only a few ex vivo studies have examined the application of erbium lasers for this implant prosthesis removal purpose 7,8,20 . The optimal laser power settings for a majority of ceramic restorations/appliances have been reported in the range of 4.0 to 5.5 Watt 8,12,20,41,47,48 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Only a few ex vivo studies have examined the application of erbium lasers for this implant prosthesis removal purpose 7,8,20 . The optimal laser power settings for a majority of ceramic restorations/appliances have been reported in the range of 4.0 to 5.5 Watt 8,12,20,41,47,48 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8,20 The optimal laser power settings for a majority of ceramic restorations/appliances have been reported in the range of 4.0 to 5.5 Watt. 8,12,20,41,47,48 It appears that the time required to debond ceramic restorations correlates to the volume of the luting cement, 49 the size of the abutment surface area, 48 thickness and characteristics of the restorative materials, 6,38,42,48 and chemical composition of the luting cement. 37 In general, it takes longer to debond zirconia than lithium disilicate crowns from either natural teeth or implant abutments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This new technique of veneer debonding was inspired by its practice on orthodontic ceramic brackets that began in early 1990s 4 and which its success was evidenced by several studies 8,9 . There are various laser sources that have been used for this purpose such as the Nd:YAG 10 , Er:YAG 9 , Er,Cr:YSGG 8 and CO 2 11 lasers, but most researchers agree that for debonding aims, the Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG lasers yield better results than other laser system 12,13 . Calabro et al 14 (2019) in their case report stated that the Er:YAG laser assisted debonding of 11 ceramic laminates compared to the conventional removal method, was more efficient and comfortable both to the patient and the dentist, less time consuming and with preservation of the remaining tooth structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O estudo de Albalkhi et al (8) observou que os padrões de fratura predominantes foram adesiva e coesiva, já Giraldo-Cifuentes et al (34) utilizaram o laser Er,Cr:YSGG e constataram que o padrão de fratura foi predominantemente adesivo. Em nosso trabalho nos grupos com irradiação a laser de 3 W de potência média, as fraturas foram predominantemente do tipo adesiva, nos grupos com irradiação a laser de 3,5W as fraturas foram predominantemente do tipo coesiva.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified