2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eprinomectin accumulation in Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus: Pharmacokinetic and efficacy assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the efficacy of subcutaneously administered EPM against R. microplus has not yet been reported, the results of the present experiment could not be compared with other data. However, efficacy similar to that found in previous studies using different doses with pour on formulations was achieved; these studies include those of Davey, Miller, George, and Miller () (0.5 mg/kg), Aguirre et al () (1 mg/kg), and Lifschitz et al () (1.0 mg/kg and 1.5 mg/kg). Similar studies were conducted by Davey et al () with injectable ivermectin and moxidectin and by Davey, Miller, George, and Klavons () with injectable doramectin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Since the efficacy of subcutaneously administered EPM against R. microplus has not yet been reported, the results of the present experiment could not be compared with other data. However, efficacy similar to that found in previous studies using different doses with pour on formulations was achieved; these studies include those of Davey, Miller, George, and Miller () (0.5 mg/kg), Aguirre et al () (1 mg/kg), and Lifschitz et al () (1.0 mg/kg and 1.5 mg/kg). Similar studies were conducted by Davey et al () with injectable ivermectin and moxidectin and by Davey, Miller, George, and Klavons () with injectable doramectin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Mean pharmacokinetic parameters, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation obtained from plasma analysis of 12 treated animals NASCIMENTo ET Al.subcutaneously administered EPM against R. microplus has not yet been reported, the results of the present experiment could not be compared with other data. However, efficacy similar to that found in previous studies using different doses with pour on formulations was achieved; these studies include those ofDavey, Miller, George, and Miller (2005) (0.5 mg/kg),Aguirre et al (2005) (1 mg/kg), andLifschitz et al (2016) (1.0 mg/kg and 1.5 mg/kg). Similar studies were conducted by…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(B.) microplus as susceptible to eprinomectin, coupled with the fact that peak plasma levels of this same active formulation (1.0 and 1.5 mg/kg) in treated cattle occurs between 2 and days after administration (Lifschitz et al, 2016). Therefore, populations of R.…”
Section: Criteria For Diagnosis Of Susceptibility or Resistant/low Sumentioning
confidence: 99%